Requests for the next game (assuming its the pacific)

[bobbysocks]

i wonder if this anti-epilepsy filter is going to effect us?? or push the release date of anything maybe coming our way? i know this is concerning PC but i would suspect that it would be translated into console play as well.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=19418

[haitch40]

Well I think it would be great for relaxation the pacific imagine the following setup: free flight midway evening

[mavrickandgoose]

Was just thinking it would be cool to be able to have multipal small teams in a team battle image 3 or four teams of 3 all battling it out at the same time I think it would be fun

[Cryptic Phant0m]

I like what "haitch40" mentioned.

Free Flight would be really nice....(Flying a P-38 over the islands at Dusk, would be Sweeeeet!)

But Aircraft Carrier battles would be the best.

[flynlion]

Am I the only person who hates that "deadzone" you get when using flight sticks w 360? Sure would be nice if they could fix that in the next game.

[williamcg1979]

Originally Posted by Shadowcorp

That the game be more than just a pacific campaign, for i will not buy a game solely based in the pacific. European, Russian and north african campaigns would all be preferable to the pacific

Oh yeah....because bombing static targets on the ground, and fighting the same country every single time is ALWAYS preferable to say, recreating the battle of midway, coral sea, sinking the Yamato, the battle of leyte gulf, and many, MANY island ground-support missions that could be flown (such as the aforementioned iwo jima, or even guadalcanal), all while looking at something other than german or russian countryside.....

[mavrickandgoose]

Originally Posted by williamcg1979

Oh yeah....because bombing static targets on the ground, and fighting the same country every single time is ALWAYS preferable to say, recreating the battle of midway, coral sea, sinking the Yamato, the battle of leyte gulf, and many, MANY island ground-support missions that could be flown (such as the aforementioned iwo jima, or even guadalcanal), all while looking at something other than german or russian countryside.....

100% agreed

[Gilly]

Originally Posted by williamcg1979

Oh yeah....because bombing static targets on the ground, and fighting the same country every single time is ALWAYS preferable to say, recreating the battle of midway, coral sea, sinking the Yamato, the battle of leyte gulf, and many, MANY island ground-support missions that could be flown (such as the aforementioned iwo jima, or even guadalcanal), all while looking at something other than german or russian countryside.....

Owing to the fact that they happened late in the war then yes!
The facts are that there was a war going on long before the pacific campaign and more so interesting missions- dambusters/ tirpitz attacks/ sub pens to name just a few. So YES it is ALWAYS preferrable. I would though like to see inclusion of that theatre but knowing that the devs are russian I wouldn't get your tissues out quite yet.

I guess your just here to troll rather than add anything constructive anyway judging by the fact you haven't introduced yourself, probably have never played the game and come in all guns blazing with YOUR SHOUTY CAPS..... Reminds me of something but I can't quite put my finger on it.

[mavrickandgoose]

Why is everyone so against pacific it has carrier battles island hopping bombing japan throw in some flying tigers over china and black sheep I personally think it has more to offer then fighting over the channel and bombing Europe just my 2 cents

[Gilly]

Originally Posted by mavrickandgoose

Why is everyone so against pacific it has carrier battles island hopping bombing japan throw in some flying tigers over china and black sheep I personally think it has more to offer then fighting over the channel and bombing Europe just my 2 cents

I'm personally not at all against it one bit. I'd love to launch off a carrier, have the backdrop of atoll's whilst dogfighting, attack beachheads whilst supporting troops, fly- corsairs, 25's, 29's, zeros, bettys you name it I'd take it. But fantasy and reality are sadly are two different things. The point I guess is more when I say 'you name it I'd take it', I wish just for a sequel and I don't really care as to what theatre it is. The harsh facts are though is that IL2 is; a niche market; it's Russian developed so it's always going to have a European/ Russian bias(look at GT5, how many Japanese cars...40 mx'5's!); the maps produced already aren't pretty good so why not use them and expand say the aircraft available (hence why I think the pacific would therefore be additional to this). And lastly I'm English so I'm always going to lean this way as it's what I know and I'll always stand firm on that, but also with tongue firmly in cheek. By the same token I'd respect that the same is true for most of my mates on the other side of the pond who think just as you do. I don't think there's any hatred whatsoever here for it, my previous post above is more about 'trolls' than anything and is replying in exactly the same way as was posted by said troll. 'my war was better than your war' type posts are always going get anyone with half a brains back up. As you know yourself war isn't nice full stop. Think in 70 years time people playing an Iraq war aim wanting an afganistan war sequel because 'it was a better war'. Anyway, spleen venting over and I graciously bow out of this thread.