Friday Update, April 13, 2012

[Insuber]

I guess that Sean is addman who provided the G.50 manual.

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by klem

Ummm a bit late now but I am wondering who Sean is (who provided Luthier with FM data) and what he would have provided.

" We used actual pilot's notes and flight testing data during the process (thank you Sean!). "

Anyone?

See post #29 here;

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=31099&page=3

[addman]

Originally Posted by Insuber

I guess that Sean is addman who provided the G.50 manual.

Nah, my real name is not Sean . I think that Sean guy supplied the with detailed data on many different engines and stuff.

"We've performed a tremendous amount of work testing and improving flight models in the game, as well as improving various aircraft engines. We used actual pilot's notes and flight testing data during the process (thank you Sean!)."

[LcSummers]

Originally Posted by addman

Nah, my real name is not Sean . I think that Sean guy supplied the with detailed data on many different engines and stuff.

"We've performed a tremendous amount of work testing and improving flight models in the game, as well as improving various aircraft engines. We used actual pilot's notes and flight testing data during the process (thank you Sean!)."

His real name is addman

Just kidding

[Majo]

I was wondering why BlackSix/Luthier would open the debate about FMs and so on, just right with the announcement
of the almost, almost, almost ready patch.

A patch that, in their words, was only going to be a graphic patch.

Not that I do not think that adjusting the FMs to their maximum possible historical correction is great.

It is, and I think is the way to go…

Is just that I do not understand why this has to be mixed up with the FMs discussions and the sempitern question
of “Who won the war?” as the greatest and irrefutable argument for aircraft performance.

Salutes Majo.

[king1hw]

On the disappearing planes:

When I focused real hard I could see the 109s but it seams like they do have no contrast at the that stage and then they get darker. What they should do is like the guy with the RoF post some how add some contrast to that LOD then they would not disappear.

I am hopeful that the patch fixes a lot, but from reading the post I am not encouraged. When I look at the modeling and the reason why I was so excited about the game is that the DM would be the best to not have Radiator damage is BAD.

Anyway waiting patiently for the ALL PATCH LOL.

king

[Conte Zero]

I am sorry for the stupid questions, but I have been away for a while, not using this game nor my Steam

what should I do with this latest 13 april update?
will Steam download and install it automagically?

my pc is not optimal for the specifications, tha game used to run, but with some tweaking on detail and rgaphics, and I had the stuttering effect.

will this new version strongly better the situation?
I can't wait. thank you all.

by the way my actual version is 1.05.15950

[Insuber]

Originally Posted by Conte Zero

I am sorry for the stupid questions, but I have been away for a while, not using this game nor my Steam

what should I do with this latest 13 april update?
will Steam download and install it automagically?

my pc is not optimal for the specifications, tha game used to run, but with some tweaking on detail and rgaphics, and I had the stuttering effect.

will this new version strongly better the situation?
I can't wait. thank you all.

by the way my actual version is 1.05.15950

The patch is not yet published. In few days we should get the beta, you will need to download it and install manually. Once our beta test is done the patch will be distributed through Steam, probably with a 1.1 something version.

Cheers!

[Conte Zero]

Originally Posted by Insuber

The patch is not yet published. In few days we should get the beta, you will need to download it and install manually. Once our beta test is done the patch will be distributed through Steam, probably with a 1.1 something version.

Cheers!

thank you, I have to get used to all the stuff again after this long pause.
a 1.1 version!
considering we have been under 1.0.something for ages, sounds like a major upgrade

[klem]

Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch

See post #29 here;

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=31099&page=3

Ahhhh IvanK

Looks like good data. In a way I don't care how they perform as long as its historically correct (or as near as they can be made).

Thanks guys, I feel better now.