4.13 development update discussion and feedback

[Tolwyn]

For the old and non-tech geeky, what am I looking at?
I see that the before and after vids are different, but what's changed or happening?

[Sita]

hard to see that in video ... but now in ships all gun are firing... with normal rate of fire ...
before that for example quad gun turret firing by one barrel but with x4 rate of fire ...

it was a try to compare old and new version

[stugumby]

Just curious as to whether there will be any map fixes or upgrades or new maps etc in 413.1 Im wanting to do some 42 new guinea missions of IJN landings at Buna etc and Oro bay anti shipping attacks but the current maps have only parts of whats needed or have a years later airfields everywhere etc. Also Goodenough island stranded troops and allied landings etc.

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by Tolwyn

For the old and non-tech geeky, what am I looking at?
I see that the before and after vids are different, but what's changed or happening?

Originally Posted by Sita

hard to see that in video ... but now in ships all gun are firing... with normal rate of fire ...
before that for example quad gun turret firing by one barrel but with x4 rate of fire ...

it was a try to compare old and new version

Turrets & gunners now under independent fire control
Firing solutions are independent rather than en-mass

[Sita]

like one of my friend discribe it ))
mg fire was:
---------------------------------------
=> => => => => => => => => => => =>

mg fire now:
---------------------------------------
=> ----- => ---- =>
=> ----- => ---- =>
=> ----- => ---- =>
=> ----- => ---- =>

[71st Mastiff]

wow nice work.

[Pursuivant]

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha

Turrets & gunners now under independent fire control. Firing solutions are independent rather than en-mass

A welcome improvement to ship "AI" behavior.

Also, it sounds like another step towards getting Flak Towers into the game.

[Pursuivant]

Looking through the i18n file, I noticed an omission in the US 15th AF order of battle, possibly the most famous US fighter group of them all, the 332nd FG "Red Tails" AKA "Tuskeegee Airmen".

Here is suitable data, if any DT member wishes to add the following units to the regInfo.properties file:

15AF_332FG_99FS 332nd Fighter Group, 99th Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_100FS 332nd Fighter Group, 100th Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_301FS 332nd Fighter Group, 301st Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_302FS 332nd Fighter Group, 302nd Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"

regShort.properties data:

15AF_332FG_99FS 99th FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_100FS 100th FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_301FS 301st FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_302FS 302st FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF

Copyright-free squadron patch art here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/332d_E...erations_Group

[Sita]

Originally Posted by Pursuivant

Looking through the i18n file, I noticed an omission in the US 15th AF order of battle, possibly the most famous US fighter group of them all, the 332nd FG "Red Tails" AKA "Tuskeegee Airmen".

Here is suitable data, if any DT member wishes to add the following units to the regInfo.properties file:

15AF_332FG_99FS 332nd Fighter Group, 99th Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_100FS 332nd Fighter Group, 100th Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_301FS 332nd Fighter Group, 301st Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"
15AF_332FG_302FS 332nd Fighter Group, 302nd Fighter Squadron "Red Tails"

regShort.properties data:

15AF_332FG_99FS 99th FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_100FS 100th FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_301FS 301st FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF
15AF_332FG_302FS 302st FS, 332nd FG, 15th AF

Copyright-free squadron patch art here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/332d_E...erations_Group

Done ... wait till 4.13.1)

[Music]

Had to Sita / DT :c)

Looking forward to this.