Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 08-01-2011, 04:58 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Plus he never says the CGI flight model is accurate or looks realistic, he just says they have tried hard, which they prob have.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:03 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
You would think that a guy who flies P-51s pretty regularly would be the most upset about the unrealistic flight model in this 2 minute trailer. Oddly, he does not appear to be very upset. Maybe you P-51 experts should go over to ASB and set him straight about how a P-51 really performs.

Seriously David, i dont for one second think you agree the clip where the P51 preforms a tie-fighter turn is accurate, so why are you trying to argue?
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:04 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

I'm sure there'll be a scene with one or two all American hero's in their P51's shooting down ten naughty Germans...
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:23 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Seriously David, i dont for one second think you agree the clip where the P51 preforms a tie-fighter turn is accurate, so why are you trying to argue?
Are you talking about the scene where the P-51 pulls out of a stall at the top of a loop and then shoots the wing off a 109262? I agree. That ruins the whole movie for me.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:24 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
And as hes getting paid by them hes not exactly going to tell us there rubbish is he?
Of course not. I'm just wondering why he isn't pissed off that they ignored all his technical advice.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:40 PM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Are you talking about the scene where the P-51 pulls out of a stall at the top of a loop and then shoots the wing off a 109262? I agree. That ruins the whole movie for me.
I think this is not the worst part. I suspect they went "lets put as much planes as possible into single frame, as that will look epic" way. Wing to wing escorts, planes flying inside enemy bomber formation, Me-262 flown like prop planes and so on.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:49 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

David, nobody is saying the movie is ruined by the CGI, if you read my first post in this thread i said "If the film does justice to the story then ok il prob watch it and try to forget the P51 pulling a tie fighter turn and the rest of the awful CGI"

I can separate the story from the CGI, can you?

Who knows, the movie may still suck, or it might be great! but the CGI is to my mind not as good as it could be, and i think you agree.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:52 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
David, nobody is saying the movie is ruined by the CGI
You didn't bother to read this thread, did you? Go back and read post #3.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 08-01-2011, 05:56 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Ok most people are not. what about the rest of my post?
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 08-01-2011, 06:04 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Ok most people are not. what about the rest of my post?
Too many people in here are.

I think the CGI could probably have been more realistic. But, they're not making a documentary. They're making a movie. Every movie ever produced has made some changes for dramatic effect.

I draw the line when I see things that the average person would realize are completely unrealistic. So far I haven't seen much of that. However, this is only a short clip out of 1 hour of flight scenes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.