Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2016, 06:22 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeman View Post
I guess a Hellcat and Lancaster are possibles then.
Since it's a Grumman product any further development on Hellcat variants is off limits.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeman View Post
If it is not a taboo question, does DT have contact with Japancat who produced the modded Ki-44?
Not a taboo question, but I don't know. Some modders don't like DT. Other modders appear to have lost interest in the game and have moved on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeman View Post
With the B17 I meant A17 (Nomad) but I guess there aren't so many sources.
That's a rare bird! Variants were used in combat by Netherlands and Iraq with minimal success. Other variants were ordered by Sweden, Argentina, Peru and other nations but never used in combat. Another variant was ordered by France but arrived too late, so the French order was taken over by the RAF and then the RCAF, which used it as a trainer.

I guess it could be used as a hack for similar hapless, single-engined attack bomber types, such as the CW-22 and A-27.

Since there are surviving A-17s, theoretically there is sufficient data to add the plane to the game. But, consider that if you're asking for someone to spend several hundred of hours building a 3d model, wouldn't you want the same effort to go into a more common plane, or at least one which more development potential or played a more critical role in the war?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2016, 01:48 PM
Orangeman Orangeman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Default

I think the Spitfire XIV and the Ki-44 would be top priority for me. The former as the RAF has no 1944-46 state of the art fighters and the Ki-44 as it is the biggest gap in the Japanese line-up.

I'll see if I can get in touch with Japancat




Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
Since it's a Grumman product any further development on Hellcat variants is off limits.



Not a taboo question, but I don't know. Some modders don't like DT. Other modders appear to have lost interest in the game and have moved on.



That's a rare bird! Variants were used in combat by Netherlands and Iraq with minimal success. Other variants were ordered by Sweden, Argentina, Peru and other nations but never used in combat. Another variant was ordered by France but arrived too late, so the French order was taken over by the RAF and then the RCAF, which used it as a trainer.

I guess it could be used as a hack for similar hapless, single-engined attack bomber types, such as the CW-22 and A-27.

Since there are surviving A-17s, theoretically there is sufficient data to add the plane to the game. But, consider that if you're asking for someone to spend several hundred of hours building a 3d model, wouldn't you want the same effort to go into a more common plane, or at least one which more development potential or played a more critical role in the war?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2016, 02:18 PM
Marabekm Marabekm is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 243
Default

I have a request.
Get rid of the dates on the plane names. That way individuals will stop the misguided thinking that a plane that saw service in say 1943, was immediately obsolete and not used any more in 1944 or 45.

Lets take for instance the Hurricane Mk1. Labeled as 1938 in the game. This plane was the main British fighter in north Africa until slowly being replaced by the Tomahawks and then Kittyhawks in 1941-42. Quite capable of holding its own against Italian fighters such as Cr-42 (1939), Mc-200(1940-41), etc. Though a bit harder to fight against the 109E/Fs.

Last edited by Marabekm; 04-23-2016 at 02:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2016, 05:37 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marabekm View Post
I have a request.
Get rid of the dates on the plane names. That way individuals will stop the misguided thinking that a plane that saw service in say 1943, was immediately obsolete and not used any more in 1944 or 45.
This is a very, very easy fix that you might even be able to do yourself. All that is required is editing the appropriate ".ini" file.

While the year of introduction is useful info for mission builders and people using dogfight servers, it could be moved to the "view objects" screen.

Other than that, just assume that an aircraft might have remained in service long after it was introduced despite being progressively obsolete, like Brewster B-239 and Hurricane Mk. I in Finnish service.

But, if we're talking about upgrading the the "view object information" feature of the game there's lots that could be done.

* Reduce or remove the historical section. It's irrelevant for a particular plane model.

* Add a screenshot of the cockpit for aircraft, along with a numbered list of positions for relevant gauges.

* Add useful information that you'd want to know when fighting or flying a particular airplane - like best cornering speed, maximum manifold pressure, take-off manifold pressure, take-off and landing distances, amount of ammunition, location of vulnerable points, armor location, etc.

* Add useful information for mission builders, like month and year of introduction, month and year of withdrawal from active service, units which used the type, and total units produced.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2016, 03:32 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeman View Post
I think the Spitfire XIV and the Ki-44 would be top priority for me.
+100!!!

For German side, I'd add flyable Ju-88C6a (day fighter) variant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-23-2016, 01:11 PM
iMattheush iMattheush is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 51
Default

Any chances to add at least one plane marked with "*"? It's important, because we're talking about IL-2 1946
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2016, 06:40 AM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangeman View Post
Would it be possible to get the following flyables?

RAF
Gladiator I and II (just needs a cockpit revision)
...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mk1 1.jpg (694.0 KB, 74 views)
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (801.2 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg mk2 1.jpg (668.0 KB, 54 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (703.5 KB, 52 views)
__________________
work hard, fly fast

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2016, 10:29 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
...
Thanks Sita!

Wonderful that we'll be getting flyable Gladiators! It will fill a huge hole in the early war RAF Order of Battle, especially for the Mediterranean Theater.

It will also also give the Belgian, Chinese, Greek, Iraqi, and Norwegian air forces more of a presence in the game. Admittedly, they'll mostly serve as targets for Bf-109 and A5M2, but I'm looking forward to biplane vs. biplane match-ups against the CR-42.

Last edited by Pursuivant; 11-03-2016 at 10:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-05-2016, 12:40 PM
dimlee's Avatar
dimlee dimlee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 312
Default

Lovely. We'll read gauges without Swedish dictionary.
__________________
Q: Mr. Rall, what was the best tactic against the P-47?
A: Against the P-47? Shoot him down!
(Gunther Rall's lecture. June 2003, Finland)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2016, 12:20 AM
Orangeman Orangeman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Default Flyable Gladiators

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
...
Looking epic, Sita!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.