The Crystal Ball 2

[albx]

Originally Posted by Peaveywolf

Can someone explain what "IL-2 in the real engine" means please. Thx

screenshots of CoD with the updated engine i suppose, and not from BoM

edit:
never mind... are from the sequel...

Probably in Russia they have 4 weeks holiday over easter so that'll add more time

[Chivas]

Originally Posted by Peaveywolf

Can someone explain what "IL-2 in the real engine" means please. Thx

The development has been rebuilding the game engine, atleast the graphic portion, which was causing the main performance issues. The screenshots of the IL-2 for BOM were probably taken on one of the builds of the performance/graphics patch. All the sequels will be built on the same game engine, any fixes too the graphics, AI, COMMANDS, FM, DM, Weather, will apply to all sequels including COD. The "real engine" probably refers to one of the recent game engine performance/graphics rewrites/builds.

[mxmadman]

Originally Posted by Chivas

The development has been rebuilding the game engine, atleast the graphic portion, which was causing the main performance issues. The screenshots of the IL-2 for BOM were probably taken on one of the builds of the performance/graphics patch. All the sequels will be built on the same game engine, any fixes too the graphics, AI, COMMANDS, FM, DM, Weather, will apply to all sequels including COD. The "real engine" probably refers to one of the recent game engine performance/graphics rewrites/builds.

What's wrong with you Chivas, don't you know this thread isn't for talking about the game!?

At any rate, when I peer into my Crystal Ball, I see one problem. They keep referring to BoM as a sequel, which to me means they're going to charge full game price.

If bom includes only new models and a new map, this is in fact not a sequel but an expansion. Charging $50 for models and a map is exactly what Call of Duty does, and I don't like the sound of that. Has there been any previous facts given on this by 1C?