Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:41 PM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

XXX are you saying?
I play with AA in-game and it works, its a mod and you can find it in this forum
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 02-04-2012 at 08:10 PM. Reason: bad language
  #2  
Old 02-04-2012, 02:18 PM
Buckie Buckie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qpassa View Post
XXX are you saying?
I play with AA in-game and it works, its a mod and you can find it in this forum
that isnt proper AA, the main prob is people are forced to use low resolutions for dot visibility which inturn increases the jaggies ten fold.

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 02-04-2012 at 08:11 PM.
  #3  
Old 02-04-2012, 02:17 PM
Red Dragon-DK Red Dragon-DK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
I've never understood the constant demands for AA. I have good eyesight but I simply don't notice all the jaggies that people complain about.

Oki fair enough. But when did last get a check-up at your eyesight? Sorry - Cut not resists.
I clearly see a huge diffident between have it or not have it. Im using "injectSMAA_by_mrhaandi_1.2" at the moment to compensate for the leak of AA in the Sim. It work great. Try it out and see if it all looks the same for you Mate.

~S~
  #4  
Old 02-04-2012, 02:43 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Dragon-DK View Post
Oki fair enough. But when did last get a check-up at your eyesight? Sorry - Cut not resists.
I clearly see a huge diffident between have it or not have it. Im using "injectSMAA_by_mrhaandi_1.2" at the moment to compensate for the leak of AA in the Sim. It work great. Try it out and see if it all looks the same for you Mate.

~S~
Must give that a try thanks. My card is so poor I must run at 1280 something and adding AA would probably kill it completely but it's worth a try.
  #5  
Old 02-04-2012, 03:05 PM
Red Dragon-DK Red Dragon-DK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
Must give that a try thanks. My card is so poor I must run at 1280 something and adding AA would probably kill it completely but it's worth a try.
Take a look here. ACE-OF-ACES did a great post there and it worked well for me.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=28978

~S~
  #6  
Old 02-04-2012, 08:27 PM
Ailantd's Avatar
Ailantd Ailantd is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 290
Default

Ok, here we go with some 3d history that can help you to understand the state in the 3d industry about AA.

AA was introduced some years ago in the fixed pipeline as a hardware/driver feature, so developers just needed to tell the GPU to activate it and the GPU did all the work. You even could activate or deactivate it from your GPU driver configuration. That is how fixed pipeline engines worked and still works. Of course in fixed pipeline engines developers are limited to what drivers and hardware can do (no great fX or effects, only common and standard things). Now we have non fixed pipeline engines, wich works with shaders, where developers can (and have to!) control all about the rendering process, which is extremely more complicated and time consuming, but we can have bump mapping, nice reflections and plenty of other nice FX, only limited by imagination, hardware processing time and time to develop and optimice it. Important thing is that now all is coded by developers, including AA. In this kind of egines AA is no more automatic and need to be manually coded as post process filter over the whole image. Thats why even if you turn on AA in drivers configuration in no fixed pipeline engines it do nothing. Hardware do no calculate it automatically anymore, not AA, not anything. Coding AA filter shader is not easy if you want it to be efficient and not blurring all the image. You need to identificate manually all edges and so on... So give devs a break, things are not easy anymore as we ask for more fx and eyecandy. It can be done, but need time if you also want a lot of fps.
__________________
Win 7 64
Quad core
4Gb ram
GTX 560

Last edited by Ailantd; 02-04-2012 at 08:33 PM.
  #7  
Old 02-04-2012, 08:35 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Thank you for the info, Ailantd.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #8  
Old 02-04-2012, 11:28 PM
Liz Lemon's Avatar
Liz Lemon Liz Lemon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 111
Default

Yeah, deferred rendering has made the formerly easy step of adding AA very difficult.

And that is why you see tons of modern games that lack support for AA entirely - games like Crysis, Battlefield 3, Dead Space, Mass Effect.

It is hardly a problem unique to cod.
  #9  
Old 02-04-2012, 11:45 PM
Buchon Buchon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 437
Default

Anyway if you are able to use FSAA ( Fixed pipeline AA ) it will crop your FPS a 20% or 30%, making the game unplayable in some systems, because is a hardware demanding AA technique.

Even so Luthier said that it will be implemented but guess that it will not very soon, remember that they are currently rewriting the graphic engine so it needs get working before add things.


You guys should try until then my post-process SMAA configuration :

It is not perfect so you will see some jaggies here and there under some circumstances but have no frame rate impact at all and does a high quality AA without blurring everything.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...99&postcount=5

Last edited by Buchon; 02-04-2012 at 11:51 PM.
  #10  
Old 02-05-2012, 12:24 AM
FFCW_Urizen's Avatar
FFCW_Urizen FFCW_Urizen is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liz Lemon View Post
Yeah, deferred rendering has made the formerly easy step of adding AA very difficult.

And that is why you see tons of modern games that lack support for AA entirely - games like Crysis, Battlefield 3, Dead Space, Mass Effect.

It is hardly a problem unique to cod.
Crysis had AA implemented but not AF . Don´t know about Crysis 2 though, haven´t played it in a while . To me AF is more important than AA, because i got the feeling that with TFTs, AA got more and more useless, especially with very high dpi. AF on the other hand...
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.