Long live il2 series - Page 3

Chivas · #1 07-22-2011, 08:58 PM

COD has massive potential as long as the developers are still working on it. Most of the development team is still working on COD features while some are working on the sequel. Most new features in the unannouced sequel will also apply to COD where applicable. The Battle of Moscow I believe is not the sequel but a third party development using the new (COD) IL-2 game engine.

Jatta Raso · #2 07-21-2011, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

Well I guess I touched a nerve. Excuse me for pointing out the rather blatant hypocrisy of your attack on carguy.

i didn't attack him, i reacted and lost my temper when he attacked polite ppl (as he does all the time), i do never, as you just confirm below; so we both now all this. as you never had a word over carguy's insults, and got this 'affection' towards me, who's the hypocrite now?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

No you don't have a history of negative posting, though I fail to see why anyone should be proud for simply being able to behave.

well one more reason to be hard on those who systematically show not being able to; because it's expected otherwise; i see we agree on this one

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

Well done you! just try to keep it up in future.

you're welcome. no sweat, just as easy as in has been

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

I used plural for 'insults' as there are many of them flying about this forum.

nice pull but flawed. you used 'insults' referring me directly (as in 'Jatta's insults on the forum'), thus you giving the impression i do it repeatedly. as you acknowledge above that's not the case. furthermore i have s**t to do with what flies around or not, when you quote or refer to me you depict me and just me. there isn't and won't be nothing like 'Jatta's insults on the forum'. got that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

If you read my post again you will see it makes pefect grammatical sense.

you can lie or be wrong and still make perfect grammatical sense.

but i think you meant 'perfect sense'...

Sammi79 · #3 07-21-2011, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jatta Raso

i didn't attack him, i reacted and lost my temper when he attacked polite ppl (as he does all the time), i do never, as you just confirm below; so we both now all this. as you never had a word over carguy's insults, and got this 'affection' towards me, who's the hypocrite now?

You did attack him. Maybe I picked you over carguy because I haven't seen him complain about insults then in the same sentence throw an insult.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jatta Raso

nice pull but flawed. you used 'insults' referring me directly (as in 'Jatta's insults on the forum'), thus you giving the impression i do it repeatedly. as you acknowledge above that's not the case. furthermore i have nothing to do with what flies around or not, when you quote or refer to me you depict me and just me. there isn't and won't be nothing like 'Jatta's insults on the forum'. got that?

Right lets try and clear this up. I said 'Jatta Raso, personal insults in a forum are very telling indeed' now If I had said 'your personal insults' I would have been implying what you seem to think I was. You can twist my words however you like though it makes no difference to me how you interpret it. Your verbosity in this return has convinced me that I did indeed strike a nerve. You sir need to calm down and think about why my post affected you so much.

Jatta Raso · #4 07-21-2011, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sammi79

You did attack him. Maybe I picked you over carguy because I haven't seen him complain about insults then in the same sentence throw an insult.

Right lets try and clear this up. I said 'Jatta Raso, personal insults in a forum are very telling indeed' now If I had said 'your personal insults' I would have been implying what you seem to think I was. You can twist my words however you like though it makes no difference to me how you interpret it. Your verbosity in this return has convinced me that I did indeed strike a nerve. You sir need to calm down and think about why my post affected you so much.

look... your wrong. please do bear with me; you acquainted with the saying 'one coma can start a war'?

what you posted was: 'Jatta Rasso personal insults on a forum are very telling indeed' as in
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=24714&page=2

this is what you repost now attempting to 'clear up': Jatta Rasso, personal insults on a forum are very telling indeed'
as in above quote

it's clever to put a coma in the right place. it makes a sentence with perfect sense - a meaning with which i can even agree; it addresses the subject of the first person, implying he went over the mark on the given situation with his attitude.

but that's not the same sentence as it was posted by you, is it?..

without the coma, it carries a very different meaning; it addresses the subject on the third person, implying a repeated attitude from him. which isn't the case as i tried to correct before. you with me? i know, one coma can like they say 'start a war'...
in one sentence you address me directly about the give situation; on the other you depict me as repeated offender. don't you honestly agree that this is what makes most grammatical sense?

i'm no judge of your intentions; and if you say it's so, i have no reason not to believe so. but what counts is what one does, hence my reply. not trying to twist or shout or anything..

gee now to lighten up...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4PFi...eature=related

Sammi79 · #5 07-21-2011, 09:16 PM

Jatta Raso, you are correct. I am sorry for the confusion caused by my missing a comma - I only checked after i read your last post. I will edit it accordingly.

Lightening up

Jatta Raso · #6 07-21-2011, 09:49 PM

leave the edit let's just drop it

*lghts one up*