![]() |
|
CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD |
View Poll Results: Should we have SpitII available in servers? | |||
No Spit1 is good enough |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 29.73% |
Yes it's here we may swell us it |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
42 | 56.76% |
Not bothered |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 13.51% |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted yes.
~S~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes I completely agree with what your saying but this isn't about historical correctness its about have as close to RL performance as possible..the 109 isn't that far away bar the PP, the SpitIa is miles away in performance, you've only got to fly both and compare to see the noticeable difference right away.. Yes ok your trying to be accurate with what planesets were available but the FM isn't accurate as your already stated...if and when the Spit and hurris are fixed then remove the spitII. I'd say the community want the SpitII in place wether 'they' will fly it or not obviously loads of people haven't voted so they are not bothered either way...personally I will still fly both and enjoy both, flying the Spit at the mo is more frustrating than enjoyable Your server by the way is top notch and after all the decision is yours as to what you add in the missions. But I think AC match ups in RL performance are more important than historically correct Planests ONLY because of the way this sim is right now with it's errors. ~S~ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I bet as soon as the SYN people would follow the Pro-Spit2-faction there will be a poll asking to remove it as blue side would start to say that the 109 is so much underpowered and it is no fun to fly against Spit2s and therefore ....
![]() My suggestion: put on a server with your desired planeset. The people will then choose what they want. My guess would be that the Spit-ppl will go to this server and the 109 ppl will stick to the existing ones ... And there will be PEACE in the skies ... ![]() PS: The 109e3 is far off its nominal performance. It should make about 500 kph sea level (some cite 517) and it only makes 450 ingame. That is definitely not a tiny bit. Last edited by 41Sqn_Stormcrow; 05-29-2011 at 11:59 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
..i see great pilots here in the Spit2 being sloppy cuz they can as they what the 109's performance is like...they just need to do what they do and do it as they normally would.. The problem, what we currently have is that the Spit 2a is to the 109 what the 109 is to the Spit1a due to porked FM. Both the 109 and the Spit1s are far too slow they say whereas the Spit 2a has correct speeds. Also the Spit1a should have constant speed propeller and have 100 octane fuel. The prop pitch of the 109 should work four times faster. So whatever way you turn it you'll never get a correct match up. My feeling is that if the Spit2a is put into missions with the porked FM right now it would make the Spit ruling the skies as it will outrun, outclimb, outdive and outturn everything else. And its guns aren't that bad. I don't see a solution for this until we get corrected FM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The vote is saying it all I hope that people add it that's all
|
![]() |
|
|