Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2011, 07:07 PM
GloDark7 GloDark7 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Not here in the real world. CoD is clearly closer to real world color, lighting, and terrain. The screenshots posted on this thread are pretty definitive. If there are screenshots showing that WoP is better, they haven't been posted here.
That's a matter of opinion. I am of the opinion that WoP is graphically superior and with a properly calibrated screen it looks incredible. Blue Scorpion posted some very good shots right here in this thread we're posting in. Superb shots.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...2&postcount=47

Replays play back to this level of quality with high consistent fps (60fps).

I am obviously a fan. I am very impressed by it and it's level of support. FM is very good with the latest update and many aircraft are very close to historical performance test data.

It has it's short comings which the devs are aware of, but they are listening. It's a bloody good effort. A fantastic first effort. The sequel has so much potential.

I am not in a WoP loving, CoD hating camp. I have both games and want to see CoD become a success and get fixed. Presently CoD is a mess and performance is dreadful across the board. Landscapes are saturated and unnatural. It's cockpits are a thing of beauty by contrast. WoP's colours could be better than they are, but they are better than Cod.

It's only another game in a small PC genre. You like it or you don't. All this 'Wings of Puke, crap, shite'. I refuse to believe these are the utterances of an adult. What's WITH that? Your hatred of it is palpable.

Speaking of the real world, you are aware these are just games...?

Glo (with first hand experience of the English countryside)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2011, 03:05 PM
RocketDog RocketDog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
It's too bad that you kind find any screenshots supporting that view.

As much as I like RoF, it's not closer to real live than CoD. The colors are too washed out. It's better than WoP, but not CoD.
You do realise that you can set saturation in RoF to any value you like just by editting the startup.cfg file?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2011, 03:21 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketDog View Post
You do realise that you can set saturation in RoF to any value you like just by editting the startup.cfg file?
I should not have to. I judge the game based on how the devs set it up.

Don't get me wrong. RoF is a fantastic game. The graphics are amazing. But, if you judge the graphics by the same standards that some people are judging CoD graphics, RoF does no better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.