![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
What sort of merit? CoD appears to be superior in every comparable metric except bugs (and the bugs will be fixed). |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What's noticeable about the WoP pictures is the obvious object budget and hence limited detail in the distance and the use of haze. But actually, CloD could do with MORE haze, because that's what it's like in SE England almost all the time. philip.ed's posted view of the countryside looks unusually clear. Where I think Oleg might have a point is the lack of colour saturation in the middle of the day. If you remember he challenged some critic to send him a RAW format photo, presumably on the grounds that jpeg etc may have hyped contrast. Certainly, when the sun is low, CloD looks a lot more how I experience Kent, but there's a fair bit of human perception involved as the eye darts around the scene, with the brain adjusting contrast continually. I've photographed landscapes specifically to compare with, supposedly realistic, paintings - you wouldn't believe the difference! As philip.ed and others say, the lack of hedgerows is a real immersion killer. I suspect that's because they'd have to be tailored for the bumpy ground, but I don't know a great deal about modern graphics. This is a good discussion, nobody here is trying to damage CloD, I think we all want it to succeed. But I also want to give pointers about how it could be better. 56RAF_phoenix |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I posted photographs I have taken while flying over the South of England that show CloD actually does a pretty mediocre job of representing the real life terrain. Amazing it is not.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Totally OT but the map is the UK and the music is totally in theme!
X-Plane 9.x scenery, link from SimHQ: Last edited by W0ef; 05-05-2011 at 09:38 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In any case, I didn't seen anything about the terrain in your photographs that looked all that different from CoD. What's the difference? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You could have save everyone a lot of time and just posted this. It explains everything.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
there are not much second world war flightsims. I think thats the reason. I like parts of Clod (i hope more parts in the future) but also parts of Wop. To say clod is looking actually in all points better than wop is really nonsense. Clod has potential of course.
__________________
GTX570 @940Mhz watercooled Q6600 @3,9Ghz watercooled HP w2207 22" (1680x1050) Eheim 1250 Toyota Radiator XP Home 32bit & Win7 64bit Crucial SSD C300 64GB TrackIR 3 Pro Hotas Cougar + 18cm Extension +Hall Sensors Last edited by JumpingHubert; 05-05-2011 at 06:56 PM. |
![]() |
|
|