![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great to see a few more screenshots.
The detail in these models is superb. Are all aircraft, including AI types, being done to a similar level of detail? Are all aircraft modelled with similar level of airframe detail to the Spitfire images? When parts fly off can they hit following aircraft and cause damage? Will the "damage" to aircrew be modelled as realistically as damage to the aircraft or will "gore" effects be toned down? When bailing out from a bomber will the pilot be able to stay at the controls to give the crew more chance to escape before he bails out? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a question about the DM. Is the visual damage in the same place you hit? In IL2, you have a very general visual damage. It shows you hit the wing, but not where exactly on the wing, or how bad other then light and heavy. How will BoB's visual DM differ? Or will it use the same general IL2 DM system?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course this could be just a demonstration of combat damage in general.
regards, SLP. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for an update Oleg, but seriously, those who choose to fly the Fiat Br.20 will find out very quickly from those who see it as superflous to BoB, why they are getting shot down so much.
But yes, welcome Br.20 pilots FIAT = Fix It Again Tony |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
From bullets we will "draw" actual(exact) places of hits. This you will see not so soon and already in the 3D engine together with other types of damage. Main was to show missibg in flight aerodynamic panels of engine, etc.. It wasn't so rare in real aerial combat. For us is a great task how to make a lot of details and at the same time to render a lot of aircraft in air simultaniosly.... So all things will be optimized for this... Say it is possible to make even greater details of damage, aircraft itself , etc... but probably in case of hundreds aircraft in action around you you will need the PC that will be existed only say ten years after release Hope you all understand what the tasks we have and what the technical problems are on our board... The is no problem to make increadible amount of polygons in aircraft (or ground units), but then will follow problem of PC power, when in air isn't just one aircraft.... When the water is trasparent, when the clouds looks like real and moving, etc... BoB will be again a "fight of compromises" in technologies and will offer the best compromises that wioll be usable for many years ahead, like it was with Il-2 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And in Il-2, when it was born - nobody in industry had such "very general" |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For all other questions I would say yes on 98%. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you for stopping by, Oleg.
Pics look great. The detail on the Spit, and 88 is artwork! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Mr Oleg, when more videos can be showed to us?
News about release date? Thx a lot regards |
![]() |
|
|