![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
All fronts would.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I must say this game has me more interested in history than ever before. After flying around in these awesome IL2 planes, I have a new found respect for history's pilots. There is no doubt these games can inspire you to pick up books for research and understanding.
From my own American standpoint, you don't get a real appreciation for some of history's battles and sacrifices until you have flown a simulation in a F4F against 100 enemy planes in formation over Midway or Dive-bombed the Akagi though a hail of flak and zeros....or flown over the English channel in a Hurricane against waves of 110s and 109s .... Unlike some books or movies, there's no romanticism from the victors up in the simulator. You can clearly experience the epic power of the Luftwaffe or the Japanese as the war played out and really appreciate the skill, persistence and SACRIFICE it took to defeat these powers. You can see by the comments in this thread that people need to learn and understand their history. If simulators let you walk the shoes of those involved, one hopes you come away from the experience with a new respect and understanding for those involved. It certainly worked for me. Much respect Thanks Oleg |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Novotny
You are correct about the history channel as far as accuracy is concerned. The history channels = entertainment That said I think one important issue is the fact that people are still getting alot of information, even if the i's and t's aren't getting dotted and crossed. As a student we were forced into the quagmire of detail, which is not memorable. I favor history any way it can be explained and people are interested to listen. Ignorance of history is a detriment to organized societies. History must be a part of counsel for societies or they will repeat mistakes of the past. The study of history is invaluable. I had a great history teacher in university, because he dramatically told the stories and recounted the events. His classes were always maxed out, and he nurtured in all his students a desire to know more. Then of course he had to test us by departmental tests. Tests that were the same old precise dates and detailed stuff we would all forget before the semester ended. I favor the history channel, even for religious history. Religious history always shows always promote the 'create doubt" of creation theory. IMO, people who have half a brain can interpret the data and make their own minds are not influenced. The series on Battlefield 360 on the Enterprise is very well done from an entertainment and historical standpoint. The major points most people will remember were very well covered. I've heard friends discuss various episodes and I was pretty amazed at how interested they were, and how ignorant they were of WW2 in the Pacific. When I started IL2 I knew absolutely ZIP, NADA about the Soviet Air war. I've since read dozens of books and developed a real respect for the Soviets. A respect that I had not learned from all the negative banter of a lifetime I'd heard about Russia. So, I think it's fair to say that no matter how history is taught I'm in agreement... unless it's propagandized to promote someone's agenda. Last edited by nearmiss; 05-12-2010 at 04:36 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very good points, nearmiss.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Top band....
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is the program that I referred to here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=14577&page=4 I often wondered if IL2 was developed using any of these government funds
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why are we assuming this means SoW BoB? 1C makes loads of historical combat games, most of which actually pertain to the Eastern Front. I don't know if a sim on the BoB is going to instill patriotism in Russians. Keep in mind that if 1C is making a game, it doesn't mean that it's Oleg's.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its not necessarily BoB but I seriously doubt that the proposed “series of simulations” would bypass BoB with the worldwide record that Oleg´s Il-2 Sthurmovik have.
I hope that the proposal will get trough as there is only positive benefits for all involved. One aspect is already explained in the article, educating the nation and the world in order to correct the cold war western view of the war effort of the CCCP and placing the nation Russia in its rightful place as a superpower in the world, and off course giving the citizens the true pride of their history. The computer-tech spin-offs for Russia will be many. Heightened computer use and sale will enhance the market for developing hard- and software domestically, reinforcing the GNP and helping the export. Creating work for higher educated people and a motivation to get that education will create more schools and a need for educated teachers’ etc. etc! So I am sure the state will get its money back with interest. |
![]() |
|
|