![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back in Soviet Russia.. million men die for such disrespect, when I your age I feel a lucky to be allowed even lowsy snowball to play with!! So a piss off greedy capitalists.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have worked for THQ, EA, Vivendi and Insomniac Games... and if there is one constant, it's that no matter how many features or long you spend fixing issues in a game, even if it's one of the biggest selling masterpieces ever...
*many things have to been cut to get it shipped *there will always be bugs *you will always have man-babies whining about all sorts of sh!t on forums. Having a separate QA is horrible and can cause all sorts of delays. Most people have absolutely no clue the effort devs put into a title and that just one bug can be the cause of divorces, ending of relationships, friendships, health issues and sad children. Get a life and enjoy the game you pitiful, pitiful whiners. If not... go make a multi-million dollar selling game and then get back to me about your opinion. any moron can write what they wish to be done... it's a pro that does it. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
No need to b**** to them about it either.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope we'll get black/red outs in the patch as well...
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sensitive? Hardly... it's just now that I'm freelance and no longer working for any of these companies, I'm ALLOWED to talk this way. I've been living in the real world for a long, long time buck-o, so pucker up, buttercup.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I alpha tested Frontlines fuels of war for THQ back in the start of that game. It had a very ruff start, but the Dev team stuck with it and fixed every issue and added a ton of features that the community asked for. It lost a lot of players but in my opinion once they were done fixing it,,, it was one of the best Battlefield style games to ever hit console. 50 players/ every vehicle you could imagine and drones to boot, zero lag, and proximity chat , I mean you name it they put it in there. Its a shame that there won't be a FFOW II because they had just about everything ironed out and the sequel could have been one of the best MP games to ever come to console. I know my hat will always come off to the FFOW's Dev team, they were some the best and it was a honor to work with them and see how they took care of their community despite publisher pressure. Desode |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is way too early to talk about a sequel. There are multiple problems with THIS game. Why would anyone want a sequel before this one is fixed? If you can fix this game, people will buy the sequel; if you do not fix it, there is little reason to believe the sequel will be better. I like the game and flying games in general, but the problems with it leave me frustrated playing it rather than having fun; if you read the posts about people waiting for the patch to play, it is obvious a lot of people are frustrated. I find it hard to believe a sequel will be better, if you cannot write a patch that fixes the flaws in this one (P51D5 turns and banks left when given full right rudder and ailerons). If other games can be patched even before they are released, why no patch 2 months after release? People will compare fairly or not, most have the idea if something is wrong fix it and do it now rather than later. Promises of a patch to come do nothing to relieve the frustrations of problems now. Issue a patch, and if that doesn't fix everything, issue another but don't keep promising sequel will be better. I want to play this game and if I am happy with it, I will be one of the first in line to order the next one.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, it's not that rare that sequels are better than their predecessor. Issues of the first game are fixed in the second. It's happened before, it can happen again. Just hope this will be one of those times..
|
![]() |
|
|