![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bummer about your hardware there. I spent years with a Pentium 1.4 and would max out with five or six machine's in the air at any one time. I didn't even know what flak was untill a 2008 upgrade, now mine's a bit old again but at least is in with a decent chance of running CloD. Nevertheless, even if my machine was hopeless and I was a year or more away from replacing it I'd still buy 'Cliffs of Dover' if only to send some money Oleg's way and help to ensure he and his team keep at what they do best.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Scenario 1: You get 5 initial activations. When they are finished, you get one activation per month and that's it. If you don't use them up they don't add up, it's just one per month. Scenario 2: You get 5 initial activations. You use one the first time you install the game so you are left with 4. However, a month later it pops back up to 5. After one more month it doesn't go to 6 but stays at 5, as that is the maximum number allowed. I prefer the second option, mainly because if IL2 is anything to go by there will be a lot of people having multiple installations at some point in time. That is unless we can somehow backup the activation key, or the activation has a global effect for all installations on a single PC. To be honest i don't think i'll need more than 5 in a year under normal circumstances, but then i still dislike being limited in what i can do with something i paid for: If mods are handled in a different manner now that we're getting built-in modding support then it might not be an issue, but if it gets to be anything similar to IL2 down the line i can easily see squads who fly in tournaments with different modpacks using up three in a single month. For example, if activations don't have a system-wide effect but each installation needs its own separate activation and using IL2 as an analogy, it's easy to see what happens with a squad who regularly flies 4.09 with modpack A, 4.10 stock and 4.09 with modpack B. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Looks like I´m starting to get outdated... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now you mention it...
i5 2.6 - that would an i5-750? Doesn't work out with the 2.6 amd pendant(x4@2.6= 925/910) though. http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/best-g...w-32103-6.html I am confused. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, i5-750. 2,66GHz at stock speed.
Lots of headroom and can be easily overclocked. This kits running at 3,8 on air. Hopefully CoD shouldn't be to much of a handbrake initially. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
still, any AMD X4 around 2.6 is nowhere near the i5.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct. Seeing as the X2 with 2.6GHz is 3 generations behind, it does seem strange that they advertise comparable requirements that way. Looking at Tom's chart it should read...
(Intel Core i5-750 2.67GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 975 3.6GHz recommended) or... (Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 2.66GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 Black Edition 910e 2,6GHz recommended). I'm starting to think it was a Ubi typo. They probably meant 3.6GHz instead of 2.6GHz - which would be the first option. Last edited by Gromic; 02-07-2011 at 06:37 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows® 7 / Vista SP2 / Windows XP SP3"
What happens if you have Vista SP1 ?? It took forever to get Vista to work properly and once it did i never wanted to change anything as that can open a whole new can of worms lol. (Same reason i'm not getting Win 7, i'll be troubleshooting for a month ![]() Sorry if this has been answered, did not have time to look thru 36 pages. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Get WIN 7 64bit...you will be sorted in about 20 mins...outstanding OS
![]()
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can second that. After having to work on Vista for a few months during my army time as a conscript, i can say it was a deeply traumatic experience, i hated them
![]() Excuse me while i ramble on for a while, some of you might enjoy the story... At some point i was attached to a junior officer who took care of the wing's informatics, networks and so on (which naturally didn't run on windows ![]() Now, the unit i served in didn't operate aircraft, but it still had an important job and lots of things to keep track of. The wing in question is responsible for half the air-defence network of the country and operates patriot missile systems, plus some of its squadrons are situated in different parts of the country. Well, every week we had to compile an inventory of everything for the briefing, ranging from the amount of personnel and patriot spare parts right down to food rations, point defence flak gun status (operational/under maintenance/unserviceable and in such a case which part failed) and even the amount of individual ammunition rounds for each weapon, right down to our rifles and pistols. After all this there was the secret operational reports (which i naturally lacked clearance to work on) and descriptions of whatever training activities we were involved in. All of this information was broken up in parts where each squadron had its relevant officers supply the data once per week. Well, there's nothing worse than having a bunch of officers delaying submission of the required data for the briefing until the last 5 minutes, having them suddenly crowd your tiny office all at once for fear of the CO chewing them off if they miss the deadline and Vista throwing tantrums and errors all the while ![]() This experience made me so determined not to ever install Vista, that when i got my current PC i only got 3GB of RAM because the only 64 bit OSes available were XP 64 (limited drivers) and Vista 64 (see story above.) When win7 became available i remained hesitant for while, until the stream of positive reviews started. I got a license for free through a friend of mine (he was entitled to it through a university program for post-graduate informatics students but he didn't need it as he's using Linux) and installed it on a secondary hard drive. A month ago my windows XP installation crashed badly due to file system errors, so i finally made the move to win7 x64. Compared to XP it's like comparing a jet or turboprop to a piston engine: sometimes win7 feels like it needs some "spool up" time where XP would respond immediately, but overall performance when actually running a demanding piece of software is better. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|