Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2009, 04:24 AM
Swagger7 Swagger7 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 138
Default

The A-26 also should be in the game, in order to balance out the Axis' AR234!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2009, 02:41 PM
xNikex xNikex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Attacking from the sun
Posts: 656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggins View Post
The 'tiny prop' was not to keep it stable. It was to power the onboard generator.
You are right. I totally confused it with something else.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2009, 05:34 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manintrees View Post
Are you saying that you can visually ID those planes with enough confidence to post a list without fear of being corrected?
If so, I am in awe of your knowledge.
Years of playing Il2 on the PC

The only plane I couldn't identify off the top of my head was the U2VS recon biplane, but as far as I know the list is accurate if not entirely complete. If anyone can add to it or make corrections feel free (I'm looking at you, Anton).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2009, 10:44 PM
BadByte BadByte is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David603 View Post
As you can see, that is only 35 planes when Anton has promised over 40
If the pc game is an indication then I would put money on that theres more bf109 models, as a mate jokingly said, IL2 Sturmovik: 1946 should be called Messersmith 109: 1946.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2009, 10:50 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

They should add a Rumanian I.A.R. 80 (Like in my sig). That would be AWESOME!!! Then I could reenact my sig
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:08 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadByte View Post
If the pc game is an indication then I would put money on that theres more bf109 models, as a mate jokingly said, IL2 Sturmovik: 1946 should be called Messersmith 109: 1946.
As a dedicated 109 pilot I'm not complaining.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
They should add a Rumanian I.A.R. 80 (Like in my sig). That would be AWESOME!!! Then I could reenact my sig
You want a plane to be put in the game just so you can shoot it down? Okay, in that case I want the B24, B25, B26, Lancaster, Mosquito, more versions of the P51 and P47..........
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:10 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Well don't we all want a plane to be put in just so we can shoot it down? I mean it would be fun to fly also, but I'm not a big Rumanian WW2 fighter buff like I am with others. And I totally agree that a Lancaster, and Mosquito should be put in BoP. :d
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:20 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

True, just because I've never seriously flown at least half the planes in Il2 1946 doesn't mean I don't appreciate their availability as targets.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2009, 07:55 PM
Almighty Blighty Almighty Blighty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: good 'ol blighty
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David603 View Post
As a dedicated 109 pilot I'm not complaining.

You want a plane to be put in the game just so you can shoot it down? Okay, in that case I want the B24, B25, B26, Lancaster, Mosquito, more versions of the P51 and P47..........
You think that the mossie was easy to shoot down?

The germans were so annoyed by it they started to design a plane to specifically catch the mossie because no other planes could - the Heinkel HE 219.

Mossie=best plane of WW2 becasue of its speed and versitility
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2009, 08:05 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Almighty Blighty View Post
You think that the mossie was easy to shoot down?

The germans were so annoyed by it they started to design a plane to specifically catch the mossie because no other planes could - the Heinkel HE 219.

Mossie=best plane of WW2 becasue of its speed and versitility
Its good, and it will give most mid and even some late war fighters a challenge just catching it, but when you can have a Bf109 with 50mph more top speed than a Mosquito the catching bit is considerably less of a problem.

Not that I want to detract from its WWII record, and its huge versatility and success in the fighter-bomber, bomber, night fighter and shipping strike roles, but against a faster single engined fighter the Mosquito just can't cut it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.