Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

View Poll Results: Are the incorrect British FM killing the enjoyment of the game?
Yes 107 55.15%
No 48 24.74%
Not bothered. 39 20.10%
Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2012, 12:01 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AbortedMan View Post
Doesn't matter, man. As soon as (if) 1C puts any red plane on a competitive level with 109s, good ol' ATAG will limit them to 3 or 4 per mission. So you won't get to fly them anyway...just like they did with the IIa in the steam release version.

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead.
Okay your wrong, jesus christ man grow up.

At one time they limited Spit II and BF109 E4's to 5 each side, stop spreading your BS everywhere.

ATAG are not biased to either side, from what I have seen they have a similar number of red and blue pilots.

You should be embarrassed with your behaviour its disgraceful.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
  #2  
Old 08-18-2012, 12:04 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Nitrous, you should have ticked the "show who voted" box.

That way you could see if anyone was trying to mess with the results.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
  #3  
Old 08-18-2012, 12:18 PM
MB_Avro_UK MB_Avro_UK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London, England (Not European!).
Posts: 755
Default

I'm here to enjoy Cliffs of Dover. If Bue performs beter than Red in FM it doesn't bother me. And this Poll, although well meant, won't achieve anything.

Best Regards,
MB_Avro
  #4  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:15 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OSSI View Post
The Spitfire turns now better and dont lost energy as in real and you want turn better and want lost lower engery? Maybe we make the DM from bomber more worse too so 1 spit can shoot down 20 bomber in one time with his laserguns? The backgunner are now worse. In real a single fighter who attack a bomber formation wants to suicide.

Maybe you want a arcade sim? Oh we have one....!?!
I see what you mean, but I don't think you're entirely correct in your statement.

In the 1.07 beta for example, the Spitfire was really turning very good and it was very difficult to get the plane into high-speed stall which was plain wrong. Luckily, this has been resolved in 1.08. I believe the Spitfire overall characteristics have been changed in a good way, except for high speed roll-rate which is still way too high.

The Hurricane though is still a bit of a mess - the wing drops for no reason at all even at nice corner speed and there is no way you can get better turnrate than a Spitfire, which was the case in real life and it's well documented. Just an example regarding the turnrate while you mentioned that although the OP never mentioned it.

The OP is not very clear in the forst post, just mentiones RAF FMs in general and one has to agree for it's very frustrating for any pilots who try to fly these machines. Mind you the biggest problem is the overheating of the Merlins and the so called CEM characteristics - this has been changed quite a few times recently and on pretty random basis. I don't mind exploring the changes everytime I install the new beta patch but it's quite unpleasant to see that while some things are being fixed and addressed, others are being broken in the process - and they were alright before! It leads to funny situations like when you have to fly at auto lean mixture if you want to engage emergency power, which is hilarious but there we go. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the beta patches and I can see the devs are trying to improve things, but they are somehow not getting there. Have you tried fighting the enemy at 2200rpm csp? That does not make sense, but you have to do that otherwise you'll blow your engine up for no logical reason at all. At random altitudes, mind you. You are simply gonna die no matter what tactics you come up with... still fun. I am coping with that but I can tell you that it is really frustrating sometimes. Maybe difficult to see on the other side of the river where you can bang your Erhoehte Notleisung again and again and again and again.

I also like the general tweaks of the rudder response - this concerns all planes in new beta. It's still not perfect but much better than it was. Same with negative G and other tweaks. DM of the Spitfire needs lots of attention though, like wing thoughness and other important details like canopy drag, flaps behaviour etc etc etc.

In general, I very much agree with Notafinger! and vranac, I typed too much already but no matter how you look at it, the Reds have got it more difficult at the moment due to constant changes and more silly FM issues (e.g. aggressive overheating). In my opinion of course, based on my red and blue experience.

Let's better wait for next beta
__________________
Bobika.
  #5  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:26 PM
nynek nynek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitrous View Post
Thanks 1C for the improved stability from latest beta patch.
Please work hard on the British FM as its killing the enjoyment of the game for many allied pilots.

FM issues

Engine overheating
Loss of energy/momentum
Bad climb rates
Incorrect top speeds
Incorrect acceleration.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitrous View Post
Thanks 1C for the improved stability from latest beta patch.
Please work hard on the British FM as its killing the enjoyment of the game for many allied pilots.

FM issues

Engine overheating
Loss of energy/momentum
Bad climb rates
Incorrect top speeds
Incorrect acceleration.
As long as we will not have 50 plus bombers and half of that escort against 6 to 9 defenders this discussion is pointless. This is not formula 1 racing. Your average mechanic is not from McLaren group. What this sim tried very hard to forget from the beginning is tactics. Spitfire DIDN'T won the battle...radar did. One on one duel is only in the 15 seconds fighter pilot memory. I simply don't get it, why after REX, global mesh, 30 odd bombers in Mighty 8th or Rowans work we fucken go up, see from Paris to the Glasgow and cannot see buggie at 500 meters. MOST of us wouldn't pass ******* eye exam so how about leveling chances for everyone at spotting targets which is independent of hardware. Why anyone is ALLOWED to fly ALONE.....Online or off.
I went thru the phases.

Twisting joystick in open cockpit, Joint Ops school, closed cockpit and then waiting in HL for KG Alpha,nearmiss,Ament77,Starbo,sgt.Johnston and many more to take part in their coop missions.I don't give flying **** about grass or rivets on the Panzer III, what I need is continuation with more planes and some ORDER. One time Flanker35 told us that offline campaign is boring...I told Him, next time You land make sure ALL Your AI pilots land too....Flanker35 You were right about state of the game, at that time I was fanboy....I'm writing this cos somehow we've got sidetracked. One of us in the signature has this thing from Oleg about importance of pilot above the machine. I shot down him in La5 in vertical fight with his beloved Kurfürst...
some European server upper right corner ,small map and ping like 200-Vancouverite here.
Point is - to those table numbers armchair researchers - your data is for level flight ...the moment shit hits the fan is either 10 seconds or 3 minutes effort
and then usually somebody on either side will "TRY" to HELP YOU.
Sorry for crying but this thing reminds me moment when we switch from CFS3 to Sturmovik. As far as I'm concerned this game will need patch in the neighborhood of 10 Gigs something like UP or HSFX.

nynek
  #6  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:31 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nynek View Post
As long as we will not have 50 plus bombers and half of that escort against 6 to 9 defenders this discussion is pointless.
I don't think you need 50 plus bombers to get the flight model of say Bf 109 (more) correct
__________________
Bobika.
  #7  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:35 PM
nynek nynek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
I don't think you need 50 plus bombers to get the flight model of say Bf 109 (more) correct
And now tell me WHAT is correct ..tell me ,everybody and remember after enter it'll be cast in stone....go ahead

nynek
  #8  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:39 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nynek View Post
And now tell me WHAT is correct ..tell me ,everybody and remember after enter it'll be cast in stone....go ahead

nynek
As you might be aware of, all planes in the sim have got wrong top speeds and top ceiling. That would be, imho, something to start with. What you are saying about tactics, scale of operations is all nice, but completely independent from FMs as such.
__________________
Bobika.
  #9  
Old 08-18-2012, 04:41 PM
nynek nynek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
As you might be aware of, all planes in the sim have got wrong top speeds and top ceiling. That would be, imho, something to start with. What you are saying about tactics, scale of operations is all nice, but completely independent from FMs as such.
Tell me WHEN did You shot down anything above let say 6 klicks?

nynek
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.