![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm using the trimm with axis (on of the small scrolling wheel on the throttle). When i roll the wheel from +8 to -3, it takes seconds. Much slower, than the stick movement... You say, if i set the trimm to joystick main axis, it will be much faster? I can't test it now, but i am curious...
__________________
![]() ![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bobika. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thx.
__________________
![]() ![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The following photo shows the tailplane incidence of the BF109E-3a WNr 2422.The photo was taken at the Swiss Air Force Museum in Dübendorf. ![]()
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz 2x4gb DDR3-1600 GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB Logitech G35 Headset Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42) Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10 Last edited by Varrattu; 04-08-2012 at 06:34 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
![]() ![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I would not take the static display museum film of some unknown guy working the controls of some unknown condition aircraft as the standard for timing. That thing is kind of a joke actually. I can send you a film working a Mooney Manual Gear System and you would think it was impossible to do in the air. All I have to do is just casually work the controls. Reality is the system is very simple and much quicker than most hydraulic gear. You don't casually work then either, you are pretty busy on final and don't have time to waste. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That must be the reason I find it touchy, I must be giving too many degree's to soon, I will try timing my input better...as far as the aircraft having any advantage over RL use of the trim, I don't think so. I imagine that it all boils down to just better pilots online, who are skilled with the 109 and her strong points. ![]()
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't care how skilled they are or aren't. The issue is one of "was it realistically possible?". Obviously trim was regularly adjusted before certain actions were taken, such as dives, but this is different to making 2 or 3 degrees of movement inside 2 seconds whilst in the dive itself. From what I've read so far it appears that the trim adjustment is too fast compared with real life, therefore historically inaccurate.
@Crump. You do seem to dismiss things unless it is absolutely proven to you, possibly in the knowledge that you know that evidence to the level you require is not possible. This is why we use deduction, common sense and trim off the extreme viewpoints to gain a sensible perspective on the situation. To be honest mate, I'm not sure you are able to contribute anything to any discussion involving history because of this approach, and this becomes harder as less is known and greater speculation is required because it would never be possible to satisfy your requirements. I ask you, since you play devils advocate for this discussion, do you hold the belief that what we have now is correct? According to your logic it cannot be. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|