![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I won't be upgrading the day the game comes out. I'll wait until other people report back on how their rigs, their new hardware, runs the game. Most of the time when I upgrade, I end up saving a lot of money by just buying the things that will get me the most increase in performance right now. I have been burned in the past by buying video cards and CPU's that the game I was intending to play could not take advantage of. Oh, eventually something else comes out that justifies the excess hardware, but by that time the hardware in my system could have been bought for 60% of what I paid. Think about it, the hardware companies WANT you to buy the bleeding edge components to play the latest software, that's why they often work with the development companies. Development companies walk the line between providing a product that can be used by the bulk of gamers right now (medium and low settings) and the gamers that must have the latest and greatest hardware (bleeding edge expensive hardware). There is a push/pull there between hardware companies and developers that I just don't want to be involved in with my wallet. It's gonna suck if you spend $400 extra for a CPU with maximum cores right now when the games won't use those extra cores for a year or two. Been in a similar situation myself and it didn't feel good. I mean, unless you have money to burn and in that case, who am I to tell you what to do with your money? Splitter |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also, I'd be surprised if any current games even use more than 3 cores. Ditto on the graphics....this is the area where I'd be most cautious. I think there are subtle indications (speculation yes..) that nVidia may be the way to go with SOW. But Szala, your strategy of going for the absolute best (most expensive) on every level could well not be the best one - in that the extra expenditure over a more modest i7 say could be wasted. We really do need to learn a little more about how the game will respond to more cores versus clock speed, and just how CPU V GPU dependent it will be. Last edited by kendo65; 11-08-2010 at 11:16 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Apparently Intel has high hopes for Sandy Bridge!
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/san...-i7,11464.html Unless you need to upgrade now, I'ld put off the upgrade. Cheers! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another vote for:
Wait Unless you have to build now, wait until we know more. We don't yet know if BoB needs 6 cores to run at max (it might) - you may for example be better with a 4 core i7 or and AMD cpu, then spending more on the GC - with the amount you're spending, I'd think of going better than the 480, either 580 or 6xxx series, but again you need to wait to see what BoB wants. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
wow .. you do not normally see Intel saying things like that |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|