Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2010, 10:34 AM
rakinroll rakinroll is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Türkiye
Posts: 527
Default

Thanks Luthier. Btw, i agree with Hecke.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecke View Post
The terrain on the first shot looks weird.

The trees look like they would be flat green paper swimming on the water surface.
They seem to have no depth from sight of the sky.


Rest is nice.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2010, 02:01 PM
Bloblast's Avatar
Bloblast Bloblast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecke View Post
The terrain on the first shot looks weird.

The trees look like they would be flat green paper swimming on the water surface.
They seem to have no depth from sight of the sky.


Rest is nice.

PFF, what do you expect, they have to make concessions.
It still has to run on our PC's.

Thanks for the understanding
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2
ASUS Sabertooth X58
ASUS GTX580
Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz
OZC SSD 120GB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2010, 10:56 AM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

[QUOTE=dflion;172629]Thanks luthier for update

Just a couple of things 'bugging me'

1. The Hurricane propeller shape is not right (I will follow-up asaspo with a couple of photo scans) from the book 'My Part of the Sky' by Roland Beamont.

This has been covered before. There were a number of different spinner profiles used and this is a good representation of one of them. I think I remember someone saying that some Hurris were fitted with constant speed spitfire units which were slightly oversize and required an oil collection ring to be fitted behind the spinner to prevent escaped oil from getting on the screen. I think this might be one of those.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2010, 02:16 AM
dflion dflion is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 319
Default Some Historical prop pics

[QUOTE=Sutts;172642]
Quote:
Originally Posted by dflion View Post
Thanks luthier for update

Just a couple of things 'bugging me'

1. The Hurricane propeller shape is not right (I will follow-up asaspo with a couple of photo scans) from the book 'My Part of the Sky' by Roland Beamont.

This has been covered before. There were a number of different spinner profiles used and this is a good representation of one of them. I think I remember someone saying that some Hurris were fitted with constant speed spitfire units which were slightly oversize and required an oil collection ring to be fitted behind the spinner to prevent escaped oil from getting on the screen. I think this might be one of those.
Thanks Sutts and Avimimus for clearing up my query, though I don't think the prop is right. I have attached some photo scans. One of the photos titled 'Scramble' on a French airfield clearly shows 2 prop types, on the others the prop is much more pointed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hurricane props_0002.jpg (2.96 MB, 75 views)
File Type: jpg Hurricane props_0001.jpg (2.53 MB, 84 views)
File Type: jpg Hurricane props_0003.jpg (1.73 MB, 65 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2010, 02:38 PM
Avimimus Avimimus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dflion View Post
2. There is no seat head armour plate on the Bf109's - not sure if this model had it?
In real life some of the 109s did and some didn't during BoB. A similar situation to the Hurricane. If I recall correctly there were at least two Bf-109 micro-variants planned for this sim.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2010, 12:17 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avimimus View Post
In real life some of the 109s did and some didn't during BoB. A similar situation to the Hurricane. If I recall correctly there were at least two Bf-109 micro-variants planned for this sim.
indeed! there was no "standard" how the 109 looked like during BoB.
the main versions were E-4 and E-1.

they could have the rounded or later canopy.
"external" windshield armour or not.
head armour or not.
rearview mirror or not.

its pure in 1Cs decission how the ingame 109E will look like !!
all is correct
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-30-2010, 11:26 AM
JG27_PapaFly JG27_PapaFly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo'bar View Post
Propellor side view is perfect. From front or behind it has to look flat.
You're right, but when looking at it from an angle, like in pic #3, you should see some of it's thickness, specially near the axis, where it is moving slower. I see they try to implement it by inserting some shaded segments into the prop disc, but it looks odd. I've seen WIP pics shot from the side, there you clearly saw that the rotating prop is thick, but now it's totally flat.





Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-30-2010, 12:30 PM
CrazySchmidt CrazySchmidt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 102
Default

I hope all of you WIP, whiner cry baby bitches are happy that we all now have to do without real progress updates!

That’s what happens when you revert to behaviour similar to your first childhood experience of difference.

Jesus, what is the average age in this forum?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-30-2010, 12:34 PM
KOM.Nausicaa KOM.Nausicaa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 290
Default

Probably around 14...yes, sad we get restricted updates now. Great shot, thanks for posting Luthier.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-30-2010, 12:35 PM
Thunderbolt56 Thunderbolt56 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 398
Default

lmao...some things never change.

I swooped in...now I swoop out.

See ya next week.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.