![]()  | 
		
| 
		 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			that's what I don't get: all that refined engineering for an aircraft meant for war, which costs a bomb not only to buy, but to maintain as well, and frankly not that insanely revolutionary  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	![]() EDIT: well, it's not that I don't actually get it, but I find it a ridiculous speculation for something that can be so easily destroyed and won't have much longevity anyway..  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 p.s. F4? p.p.s. even more annoying was that we bought all our harriers from the US in the first place 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Well if you are looking back at FAA past 40 years, the usage of a small carrier force was well theorized and efficiently put at work. Today Italy, Spain, India, Russia has gained from that "heritage". 
		
		
		
			Bigger carrier need to work in dual, with a wider backup crew force and logistic. I fear that the move to bigger unit will lower the force effectiveness. I am not a pro VTOL but we hev seen in France that a single large unit does not provide as much deterrence as two smaller (and older). There is a strategical capacity loss despite all the top tech hardware that give a short tactical advantage. If the carrier were build in a series such as it was envisioned at the beginning, the price gain would hve make a two carrier force possible and sustanaible. Now i'ts not. Hve a look to our flat top and how rusty it looks alrdy. F4 stands for F4 Phantom K (with spey eng ) Last edited by TomcatViP; 01-18-2012 at 02:37 PM.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			nice reading about the after war RN carrier 'drama' 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	http://navy-matters.beedall.com/cva01.htm  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#15  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#17  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Pretty impressive piece of engineering right there! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Good video quality as well, beautiful to see  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#18  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Nice video thanks for sharing.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |