Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2011, 07:21 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Err not quite. G meters are accelerometers and in straight and level flight indicate 1G. As you start pushing they go towards 0G on the scale. Here is a G metre in a Yak 52 sitting on the ground i.e. at 1G.




0.1G would have the needle just above the 0 mark. Anything less than 1 is a negative acceleration.

My typo in previous post (since corrected) that means the G meter would be just above 0G reading 0.1G when the negative G cut starts.

Last edited by IvanK; 09-10-2011 at 07:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2011, 04:51 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
What do you believe to be realistic cutout ? By that I mean cockpit indications, sounds and at what G should the symptoms commence ?
May be a slight mvmnt frwrd of the pilot head each time the fuel flow is cut when the speed is high (>200mph) ?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2011, 03:57 AM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,678
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow View Post
I haven't tried the beta right now but I hope we get back some of the Merlin sensitivity so that Clod Merlin does not feel as arcadish as old IL2 cut out.

For those who cannot handle realistic cutout an option for simplified cutout could be implemented and everybody would be happy instead of dumping down the sim aspect of the game for all.

If you haven't tried it, what makes you think it's been dumbed down?
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE

AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2011, 10:05 AM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
If you haven't tried it, what makes you think it's been dumbed down?
The cutout was made old IL2-like in one of the first ever patches. I think we should have something inbetween retail cutout and what we have now. Currently it is too much like IL2 which just had a fake cutout sequence modelled.

While the retail cutout was a bit too sensitive (no inertia of the floater modelled obviously) it was basically the right approach I think.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2011, 01:32 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
My typo in previous post (since corrected) that means the G meter would be just above 0G reading 0.1G when the negative G cut starts.
In other words, the cut out is instantaneous once negative accelerations are experienced.

That is because ANY negative acceleration will cause an interruption in the fuel metering on a float carburetor.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-10-2011, 04:48 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Accelerometer in automobile might measure lateral accelerations which are null if you are driving straight

not such thing in a plane
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2011, 04:22 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEE View Post
Just been testing the new patch and apart from all the other things mentioned it seems we have a change to the neg G.

Nose down engine stops - wait a second whilst keeping nose down and engine returns to full power.

Canopy closed view is much better.
I didn't notice it comming back to full power.. But I do like the cut out effects.. reminds me of my old F100 when it started to run out of gas
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.