Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2015, 04:39 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

A typical FW190 discussion from years ago, there's been plenty of them around over the years.

Lol post#107 from this old discussion on FW190 refers to old DM discussions around that time.

http://forums.ubi.com/showthread.php...-series-Forums

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 08-31-2015 at 05:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2015, 12:22 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
A typical FW190 discussion from years ago, there's been plenty of them around over the years.

Lol post#107 from this old discussion on FW190 refers to old DM discussions around that time.

http://forums.ubi.com/showthread.php...-series-Forums
That discussion thread actually pulls in a lot of good evidence - although much of it anecdotal - about how the FW-190 flew and took damage.

That's good for players learning how to fly the plane, and for mission builders, but not so good for developers. Anecdotes are useless there. Instead, what we need is numbers, ideally statistics, and perhaps good photographs.

The exceptions might be reports by very experienced test pilots. For example, I might take Eric Brown's or Hanna Reitsch's opinions at face value.

For pilots with less experience flying different aircraft types, what's valuable is simpler numbers about the planes they knew best. For example, if Robert Johnson said that the P-47C-10 could go X mph at 20,000' at Y inches of manifold pressure, then he's probably right.

But that only applies to flight modeling. DM modeling is a can of worms. There's just no way it can be as realistic as FM since we literally lack the tools to model it correctly. All you can do is get it "in the ballpark," relative to other planes.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.