Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1081  
Old 01-28-2015, 09:53 AM
sniperton sniperton is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 253
Default

After 3 alpha and 2 beta versions they are testing a Release Candidate. This was reported nearly two weeks ago:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...t=40957&page=2

So I think it will be out in another two weeks. Really
Reply With Quote
  #1082  
Old 01-28-2015, 03:22 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh Chute! View Post
I'd like to suggests a small synopsis by team D that outlines where the development for 4.13 sits as we enter 2015. I have been away for a bit and removed from actively participating in the forum. Between discovering that we have been targeted by the spammers and attempting to stumble through the 108 odd pages of this section, it ain't exactly enlightening as much as it has been blurry and confusing.

If anyone wants to do me the kindness of catching me up with all this I would be appreciative. I feel like my house was broken into while I was out.

Cheers
Oh Chute!

Catch up by reading the read me files for the latest releases.
Reply With Quote
  #1083  
Old 01-29-2015, 01:32 PM
Jumoschwanz Jumoschwanz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
IL2:CloD failed in part because its developers concentrated on the graphics, at the expense of the things that made IL2 great - smooth gameplay, a solid mission editor, and enough maps and a big enough plane set to keep fans interested.

While it's too soon to tell, it also seems like IL2:BoS might fail for similar reasons - too much emphasis on eye candy and not enough attention to the things that keep fans interested.

IL2 and similar flight sims have lasted as long as they have because they're graphically simple enough that it's relatively easy to add content. IF IL2 gets any graphics upgrades, they should be simple things that reflect improved computer power and which improve the COMBAT experience.
I will back this up 100%.

I would not care if I had to use the graphics and plane-set from the original IL2 Demo, I want a bug-free and accurate flight simulator, not a Hollywood action movie.

All of the problems with IL2 and the community that has flown it have roots in poorly executed wet-dreams by hackers and modders more interested in themselves and entertainment than flight simming.
Reply With Quote
  #1084  
Old 01-31-2015, 03:44 PM
perproqra perproqra is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Request for TrackIR users

-option to set TRack-Z axis to control (smooth) zoom FOV

with
-on/off option for Track-Z controls zoom out to wide view
-on/off option for Track-Z controls zoom in to close (gunsight) view


like this one



Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #1085  
Old 02-03-2015, 09:07 AM
Deagle_Bubi Deagle_Bubi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Default

in2weeks?
Reply With Quote
  #1086  
Old 02-03-2015, 06:35 PM
RayVad's Avatar
RayVad RayVad is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
in2weeks?
Yep, pretty sure...2 weeks...😁
Reply With Quote
  #1087  
Old 02-07-2015, 10:32 PM
Treetop64's Avatar
Treetop64 Treetop64 is offline
What the heck...?
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Redwood City, California
Posts: 513
Default

Well, it's going into two years. Maybe that can be the new catchphrase instead?

"Two years. Surely."
Reply With Quote
  #1088  
Old 02-09-2015, 07:06 AM
N2O N2O is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Treetop64 View Post
Well, it's going into two years. Maybe that can be the new catchphrase instead?

"Two years. Surely."
Two years?... Or through twenty? Or two hundred... or through two thousand years?...
Reply With Quote
  #1089  
Old 02-09-2015, 08:43 AM
RayVad's Avatar
RayVad RayVad is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 53
Default

I personally would prefer to leave it like "2 weeks". Since that does not sound as a very long time. Also when it is shifted to another two.
Reply With Quote
  #1090  
Old 02-09-2015, 08:58 AM
Oscarito's Avatar
Oscarito Oscarito is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 32
Default

It's said that waiting makes the heart grow fonder, so...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.