![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oleg has left the building a long time ago.
__________________
Bombing smurfs since a long time ago... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know, all il2 stuff was handed over to TD, sad the Ju is lost. But I still cant believe thats completly gone?!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
as far i know DT was in contact with author ... and he gave to DT what he can ... all rest was lost
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Still, I think it would be quite easy to add the A-14 version at least. For external model, only the MG-FF should be added to the nose of the A-4. For cockpit, the A-4 torpedo bomber version would be a good starting point, the torp equipment should be deleted, and the gunsight replaced by the Stuvi.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
While I fully advocate for having a variety of sub models (i.e. a Ki-61-I Tei with the lengthened nose, revised armament configuration, etc.), sometimes it can be a lot of extra work for little gain. On the other hand... with things like Spitfire versions its relatively little work for lots of gain. Especially when the changes are engine related and entirely internal for example.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
A-14 was primarily an anti shipping bomber, but was also frequently used on the eastern front. The MG-FF was especially useful for strafing trains and soft targets like trucks.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think I'd go for the C-6a before the A-14... more bang for the buck in terms of giving us something we don't already have. The Ju88A-4/Torp and A-17 both give us essentially the same things. Unless the A-14, for example, has improved performance or defensive firepower.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|