will ai ever get so complex as to deserve rights?

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by tk471138

as far as im concerned aliens robots AI has one right when im around and that is the right to get killed by me...i hate robots aliens and AI and will not tolerate them and i suggest you people should think the same way should aliens land immediately kill them, the same with robots or AI before they get a foot hold....robots, aliens, and AI want one thing and that is to dispose of us...



the AI or robots only have what ever rights their creator wants to endow them with...

AI rules were laid out in the SF world, the 3 rules went like this from

Isaac Asimov

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

I think a few movies have used those laws from Asimov.

I'm not a SF expert I remember reading Asimov years ago and it rang a bell with me.

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha

Isaac Asimov

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

The first law has a fault - a possible deadend, because that law does not cover situation in which dilemma may arise: saving one human causes harm to another, so saving violates the law, but doing nothing violates it too. Undefined behavior anyone? That is the nastiest thing could happen in software.

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ

The first law has a fault - a possible deadend, because that law does not cover situation in which dilemma may arise: saving one human causes harm to another, so saving violates the law, but doing nothing violates it too. Undefined behavior anyone? That is the nastiest thing could happen in software.

Not really because they are not causing the "harm" in the first place.

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha

Not really because they are not causing the "harm" in the first place.

If robot does not prevent the "saving" (what causes the harm) from happening, it will be guilty for practicing harmful inaction. However, if it does prevent the "saving", result will be a harm caused to other human being.

[raaaid]

i think now we can give FREE WILL and therefore a spirit to the equivalent of litle animals

the key is in the true random numbergenerator chips

maybe in 20-30 years some people will get a high from abusing as sentient as a human ai

this videoclips deals on that what is strange for its still far away:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6pNvtOWCSo

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha

AI rules were laid out in the SF world, the 3 rules went like this from

Isaac Asimov

1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

I think a few movies have used those laws from Asimov.

I'm not a SF expert I remember reading Asimov years ago and it rang a bell with me.

Why does Sarah Connor live in fear

[swiss]

Originally Posted by SlipBall

Why does Sarah Connor live in fear

Why do you think mankind deserves to live at all?

[raaaid]

thats an strange question like why hienas or vultures are allowed to exist

i maybe so deluded as to talk with god but not so insane to believe myself him or as him as to judge

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by swiss

Why do you think mankind deserves to live at all?

Because of the laws of evolution and fire power... we are at the top for now. Our future is not cut in stone though, it may very well belong to the Bots one day.

[WTE_Galway]

Raaid ... watch Caprica ...