Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

View Poll Results: Do you prefer graphical aspect of ROF or COD one's ?
ROF 26 18.71%
COD 113 81.29%
Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-26-2012, 11:03 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by startrekmike View Post
BoS will not be free to play, we know that much about it from what they have said about it.

I know that it does not fit the whole "BoS is just ROF repackaged!" crap but we at least know it will not use the same business model as ROF.

Do some reading on the FAQ before you follow the assumptions that many are making on this board.

now, what assumptions would they be you suggest I'm making/ following?
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4

Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series



Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
  #2  
Old 12-26-2012, 09:41 PM
Mikmak Mikmak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Please vote massively for COD.
If COD wins, maybe the new 1C/777 team will switch to DirectX 10 instead of keeping old DX9 for BOS.
Imagine BOS and ROF with a DX10 graphical engine...

For much more effect, vote also massively in this post of the Rise of Flight forum

Last edited by Mikmak; 12-26-2012 at 09:46 PM.
  #3  
Old 12-26-2012, 10:25 PM
arthursmedley arthursmedley is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: devon, uk
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikmak View Post

Please vote massively for COD.
If COD wins, maybe the new 1C/777 team will switch to DirectX 10 instead of keeping old DX9 for BOS.
Imagine BOS and ROF with a DX10 graphical engine...

For much more effect, vote also massively in this post of the Rise of Flight forum
  #4  
Old 12-26-2012, 10:53 PM
stndbfrgrn stndbfrgrn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikmak View Post
Please vote massively for COD.
If COD wins, maybe the new 1C/777 team will switch to DirectX 10 instead of keeping old DX9 for BOS.
Imagine BOS and ROF with a DX10 graphical engine...

For much more effect, vote also massively in this post of the Rise of Flight forum
I'm sure you know that Cliffs Of Dover was first released with a DirectX 9 engine, and only after updated to DX 10. See "BETA PATCH v1.06.17582 - May 05, 2012".
Since "the looks", and not the performance, seems to be what you guys are on about here with this pointless poll, tell me what big priceless aesthetic difference the change made to you.
  #5  
Old 12-26-2012, 11:16 PM
arthursmedley arthursmedley is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: devon, uk
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stndbfrgrn View Post

I'm sure you know that Cliffs Of Dover was first released with a DirectX 9 engine, and only after updated to DX10.
  #6  
Old 12-27-2012, 09:11 AM
stndbfrgrn stndbfrgrn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arthursmedley View Post
Ooops, I felt like I was making a mistake by writing that... maybe it had both DX 9 and DX 10 support at release?
But were there any differences on an aesthetic level, between the two?

Last edited by stndbfrgrn; 12-27-2012 at 09:23 AM.
  #7  
Old 12-27-2012, 04:52 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stndbfrgrn View Post
But were there any differences on an aesthetic level, between the two?
What do you think was the reason for posting FPs?
  #8  
Old 12-27-2012, 06:39 PM
stndbfrgrn stndbfrgrn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
What do you think was the reason for posting FPs?
I'm not sure that by "FPs" you mean frames/second but, if so, that would suggest a simple difference in performance and not in strict graphics quality, yes?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.