Graphical aspect preference ROF vs COD and other stuff

[Richie]

The flight models in ROF are sure not arcade. There will be a ton of IL-2 carry overs that will want Battle Of Stalingrad and it will make no sense to make a Wings Of Prey type sim right?

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by Richie

The flight models in ROF are sure not arcade. There will be a ton of IL-2 carry overs that will want Battle Of Stalingrad and it will make no sense to make a Wings Of Prey type sim right?

They are not definitely not arcade, that I agree however they are not up to scratch some aircraft it seems are way too slow and have been for quite sometime even with constant threads on what needs to be corrected

[=CfC= Father Ted]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

They are not definitely not arcade, that I agree however they are not up to scratch some aircraft it seems are way too slow and have been for quite sometime even with constant threads on what needs to be corrected

In fact most of the complaints on the RoF forums are about planes that are perceived to be too fast, which only goes to show that, when it comes to FMs, we all have our own ideas. Some of those ideas seems to have some sort of fanboi bias - "Spit/190/P51 was the best fighter in the war, it should...". or even Red/Blue bias, which is more subjective than objective.

In short, I've yet to join a combat flightsim forum in which the community agree on the FMs on all planes in the game, so to single out RoF and its devs as being remiss in this department is a little disingenuous.

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by =CfC= Father Ted

In fact most of the complaints on the RoF forums are about planes that are perceived to be too fast, which only goes to show that, when it comes to FMs, we all have our own ideas. Some of those ideas seems to have some sort of fanboi bias - "Spit/190/P51 was the best fighter in the war, it should...". or even Red/Blue bias, which is more subjective than objective.

In short, I've yet to join a combat flightsim forum in which the community agree on the FMs on all planes in the game, so to single out RoF and its devs as being remiss in this department is a little disingenuous.

LOL I was not saying that 777 were the only ones that cannot get the FMs just look at il2: 1946 and COD

I entirely agree that its an impossible task to make an FM that everyone agrees upon

[Wolf_Rider]

There isn't much FM difference of opinion whinging with DCS

RoF has been out (in the wild) for years and CoD hasn't... so of course the RoF is going to have less bugs, and do keep in mind RoF was extremely buggy when first released. (crikey) given the amount of time RoF is in release, it would have been nice to see how the CoD engine would have polished up, given the same opportunity)

Also... be prepared for Pay to Play (online subscription service) with BoS

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

There isn't much FM difference of opinion whinging with DCS

RoF has been out (in the wild) for years and CoD hasn't... so of course the RoF is going to have less bugs, and do keep in mind RoF was extremely buggy when first released. (crikey) given the amount of time RoF is in release, it would have been nice to see how the CoD engine would have polished up, given the same opportunity)

Also... be prepared for Pay to Play (online subscription service) with BoS

Well that is good news for tree, he has been asking for that for years

[startrekmike]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

There isn't much FM difference of opinion whinging with DCS

RoF has been out (in the wild) for years and CoD hasn't... so of course the RoF is going to have less bugs, and do keep in mind RoF was extremely buggy when first released. (crikey) given the amount of time RoF is in release, it would have been nice to see how the CoD engine would have polished up, given the same opportunity)

Also... be prepared for Pay to Play (online subscription service) with BoS

BoS will not be free to play, we know that much about it from what they have said about it.

I know that it does not fit the whole "BoS is just ROF repackaged!" crap but we at least know it will not use the same business model as ROF.

Do some reading on the FAQ before you follow the assumptions that many are making on this board.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by startrekmike

BoS will not be free to play, we know that much about it from what they have said about it.

I know that it does not fit the whole "BoS is just ROF repackaged!" crap but we at least know it will not use the same business model as ROF.

Do some reading on the FAQ before you follow the assumptions that many are making on this board.

now, what assumptions would they be you suggest I'm making/ following?

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by startrekmike

BoS will not be free to play, we know that much about it from what they have said about it.

I know that it does not fit the whole "BoS is just ROF repackaged!" crap but we at least know it will not use the same business model as ROF.

Do some reading on the FAQ before you follow the assumptions that many are making on this board.

startrekmike,

you should have the decency to identify yourself as a RoF employee (or stake holder), and not make misleading spin control statements here glorifying RoF and pretend you are a normal impartial CoD forum member

another sign of how underhanded the whole RoF clique is

folks if its that easy to mold your minds with a bit of spin control, you deserve all you'r gonna get, more RoF junk with a new coat of paint lol

you've just been social engineered folks, enjoy the show