![]() |
|
|||||||
| Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
| View Poll Results: Do you prefer graphical aspect of ROF or COD one's ? | |||
| ROF |
|
26 | 18.71% |
| COD |
|
113 | 81.29% |
| Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It should have read beta on the box and with a much higher system requirement on there too...the amount of dx9 out there didn't help matters either.
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would like every sim to have the graphical beauty of CloD or even DCS A-10C but that is simply not a option for every company.
In terms of pure playability, I would choose ROF every time, the menu's work properly (I can actually choose options in quick battle as opposed to porting them over to the editor, altering them so that I have useful loadouts and to try and get the AI to not spiral into the channel), the framerate is very consistent at high settings and online games tend to run very stable. I see this thread has starting going in to the realism aspect, I also notice that some seem to think that ROF is not as realistic as CloD, to me, that is a pretty silly thing to say, while ROF does not have the nice clickable cockpits, that does not mean that it does not have a superior flight and physics model (the planes in CloD feel a bit dead compared to ROF aircraft, like they are not travelling in air). I suppose it all comes down to personal taste in the end, I love both titles but I think that ROF is not nearly as graphically inferior or as arcade as some on this forum would like us all to think. Both are good in different ways, I tend to stick to ROF because it always works properly but I play CloD because it is the only decent WWII sim out there even if the menu problems drive me crazy. Anyway, this thread topic is a pretty loaded question, not sure what kind of response anyone was expecting. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The flight models in ROF are sure not arcade. There will be a ton of IL-2 carry overs that will want Battle Of Stalingrad and it will make no sense to make a Wings Of Prey type sim right?
Last edited by Richie; 12-25-2012 at 11:52 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In short, I've yet to join a combat flightsim forum in which the community agree on the FMs on all planes in the game, so to single out RoF and its devs as being remiss in this department is a little disingenuous. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I entirely agree that its an impossible task to make an FM that everyone agrees upon
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There isn't much FM difference of opinion whinging with DCS
RoF has been out (in the wild) for years and CoD hasn't... so of course the RoF is going to have less bugs, and do keep in mind RoF was extremely buggy when first released. (crikey) given the amount of time RoF is in release, it would have been nice to see how the CoD engine would have polished up, given the same opportunity) Also... be prepared for Pay to Play (online subscription service) with BoS
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound. Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 12-25-2012 at 08:57 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
For example, if BoS ends up with a damage model that is merely a slight upgrade of the old IL2 DM, then it will surely be a dissapointment. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In fact if it is a upgraded IL2 i will be more than happy. We will all have to choose, nobody is right or wrong.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
If that was what we got in 2007 we would'nt be having this discussion and we'd probably be in The Med or back in Western Europe by now on the new engine. If it had been an upgraded IL2 with a more powerful engine capable of easily doing what the mods can do with a better DM FM CEM and a fully functional MDS and imporived graphics 2048 skuns with alphas that looked like IL2 on it's lesser settings and close to CoD on high settings and ran with frames of 20-25 on older rigs everyone would have probably been ecstatic.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|