Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2012, 03:50 PM
zapatista's Avatar
zapatista zapatista is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey View Post
..... how idiotic BoS will be, despite very little about BoS actually being known yet and it still being about 2 years off? ............And yet strangely, that you're doing the exact same thing about BoS is okay? Odd how that goes.
i think you might have missed the announcement, go read it and inform yourself.

BoS is essentially a spruced up RoF with a few ww2 aircraft and some new ground textures. they dont have the il2sturmovik flight model code, and most of the other aspects of what make a flightsim will be significantly inferior. its essentially the RoF ww2 sim the RoF group were already were working on, but its now funded by 1C and allowed to use the sturmovik name in return for a slice of the profits.

as was put earlier

Quote:
just be aware that with your complete misreading of what this ww2-RoF game is going to be like, you've just started to pretend RoF's BoS is going to be some great high tech marvel, with flightmodels better then il2 and CoD, with better and more detailed plane models, better modeling of aircraft components and subsystems with more complex damage models, better more detailed scenery, more objects on the ground and in the air, servers with more players online then the 90 now possible with CoD (yes you even missed the netcode was fixed lol), more detailed damage models for aircraft inside and external, better more realistic weather systems, better modeling of real time ww2 radar systems, better highly detailed low level scenery with moving grass/crops, extended clear visibility to the horizon,...... and..... and.......hang on, you dont REALLY believe that do you ?
and that about sums it up

tree and his little chums are cheering and squeaking in delight, and they dont even understand what giant step backwards this whole BoS will be, because from the start it is designed to be something very very different compared to the next gen SoW sturmovik series
__________________
President Dwight D. Eisenhower 1953: Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone, it is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children

Last edited by zapatista; 12-15-2012 at 03:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2012, 03:55 PM
il_corleone's Avatar
il_corleone il_corleone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 204
Default

i dont think bom will be a Great Succes, the only thing that can move you to buy it , its because ROF is a succes, and there are no more modern ww2 sims whit russian theatre out there...
__________________
GTX560TI 2GB-I5 2500-4GB DDR3-488GB Western Digital WD5000AAKX-Win7 64-Bits

[IMG]http://www.rincondesimulacion.com/im...00x200warz.png[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2012, 04:04 PM
Fjordmonkey Fjordmonkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Larvik, Norway
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zapatista View Post
i think you might have missed the announcement, go read it and inform yourself.

BoS is essentially a spruced up RoF with a few ww2 aircraft and some new ground textures. they dont have the il2sturmovik flight model code, and most of the other aspects of what make a flightsim will be significantly inferior. its essentially the RoF ww2 sim the RoF group were already were working on, but its now funded by 1C and allowed to use the sturmovik name in return for a slice of the profits.

as was put earlier



and that about sums it up

tree and his little chums are cheering and squeaking in delight, and they dont even understand what giant step backwards this whole BoS will be, because from the start it is designed to be something very very different compared to the next gen SoW sturmovik series
I'll make it simple for you, then: If you don't like it, don't buy it. It is really that simple. And when it does come around, I'll take a look at it and then decide if I like it or not.

And you do seem extremely adamant in that BoS, a product you haven't seen, haven't played and haven't experienced, will be a giant step backwards. I find your attitude to be strange and so ass-backwards that I have a very hard time seeing the logic of it all.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2012, 04:33 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Zap, can you post a link where ive gloated over the death of COD, or squealed even a tiny bit of delight.

Im happy that the next sim will be made by 777 and 1C yes, but ive no made any post gloating the death of COD.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2012, 06:38 PM
Cranky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The thing is this Zappy, you claim that I didn't support CLOD, well I did, I paid the full retail price for it when it was released. You however have openly admitted here on these forums that you waited for CLOD to be in the 'crap rack' before you purchased it. Enough said.


Good to see the moderators are on top of the personal attacks, great work boys.

Last edited by Cranky; 12-15-2012 at 06:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2012, 02:09 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Gents, why continue to argue?

Cliffs of Dover is now abandonware.

It doesnt' matter anymore.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2012, 10:44 AM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

Abandonware, you mean like old software everyones .. umm abandoned? In 12 months time, CLOD will probably still be the best WW2 sim, and the best BOB sim for many years to come.

I wish they'd abandon it in my direction ..

.
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2012, 12:40 PM
Red Dragon-DK Red Dragon-DK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Gents, why continue to argue?

Cliffs of Dover is now abandonware.

It doesnt' matter anymore.
You mean like DX9 games?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2012, 06:54 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Hold on here, I'm no fan boy of the RoF enigne, so don't pin that nonsense on me.

All I'm saying is that the developer has abandoned this title. Hence the term abandonware. NO more support, NO more updates, No more anything from 1C for it.

I'll still fly it, but, over time it will end up on the heap of forgotten games, with maybe a dozen or so folks still playing it.

And don't expect this forum to stay up forever either. 1C has placed their eggs in another basket. Continuing to support this "communtiy" will be counterproductive to their goal of making the new sim a success.

Not saying I like it, just facing reality.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.