![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Points taken sir.
I've posted on our forum that I don't think BoS is going to be, well, I'll say very good here, as to not have Uther ban me. The RoF enigine is an older development and has severe limitations. I hope I am wrong, but I don't think I am.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
BoS on the RoF engine, I believe we are thinking the same thing El. Still, time will tell.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As I said in the past, I really don't like WW1 planes but I've bought many ROF plane packages: I hope others will do the same with BOS even if the engine is outdated. In that way we can support 777 to develop contents (planes and theatres) and above all a new generation of their engine. The only thing I ask to 777 is to be honest with the customer: they already wrote about their clear objectives on the first "developer diary"... it's enough for me.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|