Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #301  
Old 12-11-2012, 12:44 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volksieg View Post
It's real. Blacksix has posted an announcement on here.

I'm staying positive about this development as it means we do, at the very least, have a future. Let's see what they cook up for us.

I would like to see them release the code/SDK though... if only as a goodwill gesture. It would be funny if someone like TD ended up turning CloD into something that blew Stalingrad out of the skies.... which is why, I suspect, we won't be getting the SDK....
I agree they are unlikely to let the community upstage them. I've very mixed feelings about the whole business and feel an opportunity has been lost but lately I had become resigned to 1C no longer being up to the job and that BoM would not have been much better (as a game engine and content) than CoD so perhaps it will be for the best.

Hero to Zero in 18 months.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #302  
Old 12-11-2012, 03:17 PM
RPS69 RPS69 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 364
Default

So the new management, with "great" understanding decided to downgrade CloD to a lesser product.

They could keep CloD as it is, and apply the expanding concept from RoF.

A pitty, it took Olegs almost six years to understand the ground concept for game enrichment, and there it comes some genius that go to the managing practice of showing everybody that he is doing something...

Well, the same as everywhere I suppose.

I should be happy, having lived the whole il2 process. It was a golden era, like 80's music. Then financial managers came and everything goes commercial.
Reply With Quote
  #303  
Old 12-11-2012, 04:27 PM
Trumper Trumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 461
Default

Is it good news?,well i suppose the other options aren't any better.Clod is dead so alot of people have spent good money chasing bad,how do we know how good the new sim will be.
Personally i have no interest in the Russian front now,il2 did that.
Reply With Quote
  #304  
Old 12-11-2012, 04:56 PM
Slipstream2012 Slipstream2012 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Coventry, England
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered_IV View Post
Quite.

Some of the clod squad will need quite a bit of time to adjust I suspect.
People that enjoy real simulations you mean and followed IL2 from the start?

Or arcade fan-boy's like yourself that just want to shoot everything down without regard for realism?

Gloat whilst you can, because if 777 don't get it right, Jason will find himself just like Luthier did, sitting on the top of the '1' in 1c.
Reply With Quote
  #305  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:27 PM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

Let us be honest, a great slab of the work invested into CoD involved getting the maps historically correct, the airfields historical and attempting to get the 40's feel and look historical for the period but that all turned out to be of no interest to the majority of players, or at least the majority posting on forums.

In the end it turned out what people really wanted was the ability to showoff their elite gaming skills in an online 3D flying FPS with awesome graphics and who cares about historical accuracy.

The new sim sounds like it will be awesome for showing off elite gaming skills in an online 3D flying FPS with awesome graphics without to much attention to historical detail mucking up the online game balance.

Sounds to me that people are getting exactly what they have been asking for.
Reply With Quote
  #306  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:54 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTE_Galway View Post
Let us be honest, a great slab of the work invested into CoD involved getting the maps historically correct, the airfields historical and attempting to get the 40's feel and look historical for the period but that all turned out to be of no interest to the majority of players, or at least the majority posting on forums.

In the end it turned out what people really wanted was the ability to showoff their elite gaming skills in an online 3D flying FPS with awesome graphics and who cares about historical accuracy.

The new sim sounds like it will be awesome for showing off elite gaming skills in an online 3D flying FPS with awesome graphics without to much attention to historical detail mucking up the online game balance.

Sounds to me that people are getting exactly what they have been asking for.
I can't agree with that. Historically correct maps? Barely, not considering the data available, its more like one of those simplified maps from a tourist guide. Historical airfields? No, just airfields put mostly in the right place with some correct runways (and too many unuseable runway surfaces). The attempt to make it look and feel like the 1940's fell short of making it feel like the BoB or historical basically due to the poor FMB which is why offline and basic on-line campaigns are naff. On-line campaigns are now only beginning to feel like the BoB because of the amount of work put into them by some of the dedicated members of the community, not easy when it calls for extensive complex scripting. The poor FMs don't help it feel historical or like the BoB either. They got close to getting it right then jumped ship.

What do we want? Most guys I meet on line want realism not FPS.

Awesome graphics? Yes I'd go with that for CoD, it is a big step forward but BoS will be Dx9. Can Dx9 deliver CoD-standard grapics? The RoF graphics don't impress me. In this respect CoD raised the bar.

My worry is that we will get exactly what we haven't been asking for. We can only wait and see.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #307  
Old 12-12-2012, 08:35 AM
Punch_145 Punch_145 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
Default

Ground Objects, frame-rate, historical accuracy, new A/C ....................Just make Co-ops work that's all we need............

Regards,
Reply With Quote
  #308  
Old 12-13-2012, 05:42 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punch_145 View Post
Ground Objects, frame-rate, historical accuracy, new A/C ....................Just make Co-ops work that's all we need............

Regards,
+1

Hello Punch
Reply With Quote
  #309  
Old 12-13-2012, 05:55 PM
Punch_145 Punch_145 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
Default

How you doing m8......................been a long time
Reply With Quote
  #310  
Old 12-14-2012, 12:26 AM
DuxCorvan's Avatar
DuxCorvan DuxCorvan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cádiz, Spain
Posts: 86
Default

None of this would have happened, had CLoD been half as good and appealing as it was supposed to be after years of unending development and heart melting promises. In the end, they were overwhelmed, they botched it, they got deaf to critics, and it was a dud. Planes were few, the campaign was a bore lacking all immersion, the FMB was a joke, the engine was stuttery and too demanding, and terrain colors were terrible Van-Goghesque pastels.

CLoD was a failure. The price to pay, is that industry does not trust anymore in the conoisseur-targeted formula. They have a business, you know, and they want it to be profitable. CLoD is not.

Of course, if they go for the mean and greedy micro-DLC business formula they used in ROF, I'm out of this one, too. And pray they don't resurrect that stupid constant online DRM they used then, now that is somehow fashionable again.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.