ATAG Dedicated Server is up!

[salmo]

Originally Posted by ATAG_Bliss

Thanks for the comments guys. We have many more things on the drawing board we plan to introduce after testing.

On another note, would anyone be interested in a map vote? It would be an option to rotate the mission if a certain percentage of players didn't like the current mission. Any ideas on what percentage of people would have to vote to get the change? Or is this not really needed?

I think map-voting would be a useful addition. Something similar to what we had in the L2-1946 server commanders would be OK. From memory this was a simple majority.

[ATAG_Colander]

It's a bit more complicated than that.

We are thinking among these lines
- Simple majority and single user veto.
- If vetoed, a new vote can be restarted in 5 or 10 minutes.

The reason for the veto is in case some one has been flying a bomber for 1/2 hour and is about to drop bombs

[klem]

About the only reason I would want to vote for a change is if its a six hour mission without CH radar, i.e. rolling the map might be very longwinded and we'd be stuck with a stale mission for hours.

Can you port the new CH radar into the other existing maps?

[ATAG_Bliss]

Originally Posted by klem

About the only reason I would want to vote for a change is if its a six hour mission without CH radar, i.e. rolling the map might be very longwinded and we'd be stuck with a stale mission for hours.

Can you port the new CH radar into the other existing maps?

Understood. I'll ask and see what can be done.

[ATAG_Bliss]

Also: Recoil has been a busy beaver. Check out the new website (still WIP): http://www.theairtacticalassaultgroup.com/atag/

[Roblex]

Originally Posted by ATAG_Bliss

Also: Recoil has been a busy beaver. Check out the new website (still WIP): http://www.theairtacticalassaultgroup.com/atag/

The link for 'Mission Briefs' does not work. Can we also have the name of the current mission and, ideally, how long before it ends?

[ATAG_Bliss]

Very much a work in progress.

[ATAG_Bliss]

Originally Posted by salmo

I think map-voting would be a useful addition. Something similar to what we had in the L2-1946 server commanders would be OK. From memory this was a simple majority.

Yeah, we are thinking that way as well. The biggest thing is trying to find a system that can't be abused yet works for the masses.