![]() |
|
|||||||
| Gameplay questions threads Everything about playing CoD (missions, tactics, how to... and etc.) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Sounds great, but €28? I'm glad if you feel that it worth it. I didn't found similar material when I was looking for printing solutions, but the paper is good enough for me. I was laminated the paper, then I can draw attack plan on it (it was used on weekend-sowc
__________________
![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Tom,
I am not telling you what I paid for the printing of the cards Quote:
Quote:
Artist
__________________
Ceterum censeo the mixture axis should be supported in IL-2 1946' DeviceLink. -------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I can imagine, 130 page plus covers isn't cheap...
__________________
![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I took one step further with the map, as it it rather big (90cm by 102cm, see my earlier post in this thread) and difficult to handle/fold during flight: I applied the Falk Patented Folding. There's no article on this ingenious idea in the English wikipedia (just in the German one), so a short explanation here (and pictures):
This special way of folding a big map and cutting slits at certain places allows to leaf through the folded map both horizontally and vertically - while never exceeding a total unfolded size of much, much less than the whole map. In my case I choose a leaf-through size of 25 by 25.5 cm and folded and cut accordingly. The pictures in this (and - due to the limitation of max 5 images per post - the next post) show the folded map, the vertical and horizontal leafing, and finally the first step of unfolding the whole map.
__________________
Ceterum censeo the mixture axis should be supported in IL-2 1946' DeviceLink. -------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Falk Folding continued
__________________
Ceterum censeo the mixture axis should be supported in IL-2 1946' DeviceLink. -------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I do not cut the map, but I folding that the whole plan will be visible
__________________
![]() i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
VO101_Tom
Tom. Quite outstanding. I will be linking to your documents from my 616sqn.tidesofwar.net website for CloD. I had wanted to do something similar. I realise it is a huge peice of work and I doubt you want to develope it further from its excellent state. The only thing I would ask is that, being a Fleet Air Arm pilot, I would love the Royal Naval Airstations (with their "Ship" Names) to be identified from the RAF and Civilain fields. Maybe just changing the names in the "Enroute Supplement". RNAS Ford - HMS Peregrine RNAS Gosport - HMS Siskin RNAS Heathrow RNAS Lee-on-Solent - HMS Daedelas RNAS Lymne - HMS Buzzard RNAS Worthy Down - HMS Kestral Heree is a reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...the_Royal_Navy Many thanks for your consideration. Gosling IL2:1946 - VBF-12 IL2:CloD - 616 Sqn |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, its really durable and perfect for the Falk-folding (slits and all). Hp had its logo printed on the start-margin and *they* spelled it Tywek. I wonder who's the original manufacturer, DuPont?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Tom,
Fabulous map, I've printed it a number of times, hand glueing A3 sheets together. Excellent work - I love it. Use it all the time. Mark it up, trash it, give away the used ones to friends. I had to adjust the sizing a little when I printed, to make sure that the scale was correct for 1:500,000. I also pushed the contrast a bit in Photoshop. Made things a bit clearer for late night reading with these tired old eyes. One thing I would like removed is the blue sector overlay. Reason: The "Alpha-Oscar 4.7" identification system varies between each mission. So the blue sector overlay is only correct for a couple of missions. I'd rather have your beautiful map without the overlay. Second I would change the scale markings in the margins slightly so that nautical miles / statute miles and Kilometers each have units (ones) instead of just kilometers having units. If you remodel the scale bars they could maybe be separated by a couple of millimeters. Reason: I plan routes by measuring the distance with a drawing compass and then lining that compass up on the scale bars. That distance divided by my airspeed gives me time on that heading. Since my airspeed is in miles I'd like to know distance in miles (to the nearest mile). Third I would take out the Green magnetic declination line. Reason: that is beautifully expressed by the compass rose in the top right. And there are already two Magnetic Declination lines on the original map (a 10 degrees W 1942 and a 9 degreees 1942) and in the margin. Lastly I would like the AFBs ICON and name layer as a separate image. Reason: Details. In some places the text is hard to read or obscures the detail underneath. Examples: 1) In the top left of the map, the names Yatesbury, Watchfield, Harwell, White Watham, Harwell, Reading etc are already on the map. The convention seems to be font: ARIAL for AFBs and font: Times New Roman Italic for Towns. 2) Also in the top left of the map there are a number of AFBs that are not in the mission but are on the map. Bibury, Witney, Brize Norton, Abingdon etc. Personally I would change my AFBs layer so that: 1) The AFB Icon has a Runway. 2) The AFB Code is in Capital Bold Arial. 3) Where the AFB Name already exists on the map don't write it out again. 4) If the AFB name doesn't exist, add it in Regular Arial. I'm happy to do the grunt work on this if you are able to output a version without the layers I have suggested. Here is an example of the proposed before and after on the AFBs layer and the contrast boost. If you PM me we can dropbox. Last edited by decay; 09-04-2014 at 06:54 AM. Reason: Left out last line. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|