Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:22 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holtzauge View Post
I'm more inclined to believe the Rechlin reports on actual production aircraft
Pity we have not seen any.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holtzauge View Post
My sole purpose with posting my chart was to provide an alternative analysis and in the end it's up to the readers what data they think is more credible
A home made chart of which's maker even refuses to share the base data vs. properly flight tested, calibrated, corrected and guaranteed flight test data.

It is going to be a tough call I bet.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:30 PM
Holtzauge Holtzauge is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Pity we have not seen any.



A home made chart of which's maker even refuses to share the base data vs. properly flight tested, calibrated, corrected and guaranteed flight test data.

It is going to be a tough call I bet.
Yes, seeing the sniping is coming from someone with a documented history of always taking the inside envelope of any allied data and the outside envelope of any Me109 data I'm sure it will be a close call.

Over and out.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:47 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
vs. properly flight tested, calibrated, corrected and guaranteed flight test data. (of a prototype)

It is going to be a tough call I bet.

yep, it is.

by the way, isn't it peaceful here at the moment, shame its going to end soon......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2012, 09:59 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Does anyone know the differences between the V15 and production E-3. I assume that 20mm guns, armour plate, self sealing fuel tanks, bullet resistant glass, were not included. Did the Germans install additional equipment to the 109 similar to Spit 1's compared to the Spit prototype, such as different radios, IFF, emergency equipment, bulges to accomodate the 20mm. All these things presumably would have impacted the performance to some degree.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:13 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Pity we have not seen any.
None from Kurfurst either, but we do have the power curves from the 109E handbook which give 470 km/h at sea level, which is far more realistic than the treasured 493 km/h.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.