Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2012, 08:32 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catseye View Post
You are such a piece of work.
Can you get them to start?? If so, tell me how? I bet you can't.
So how do you qualify it's me?? I can read the notes very well thank you and I've been flying this sim it all iterations and I'm no noob. Unless you have empirical data to show it's me best not to continue to be a snotty idiot. You certainly have not corrected me as I politely asked but rather showed your adolescent thinking. Nuff said.
You poor thing..

I know it can be upsetting at times, not being able to get things to work on the first try..

But here is some additional info that might help you out..

From the patch notes..

Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier View Post
FM
Conducted a huge amount of work correcting and improving aircraft flight models as well as most engine models.
- Corrected the Merlin engine model.
That and you might want to 'read' JG52Uther re-post of what Farber had to say wrt starting the engines..

Where you can see 'some' people got the engines to start because they had the patience to try a few things before posting here that it was a bug

Good Luck!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #2  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:09 AM
HorrorRoach HorrorRoach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Milwaukee, wi
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
You poor thing..

I know it can be upsetting at times, not being able to get things to work on the first try..

But here is some additional info that might help you out..

From the patch notes..


That and you might want to 'read' JG52Uther re-post of what Farber had to say wrt starting the engines..

Where you can see 'some' people got the engines to start because they had the patience to try a few things before posting here that it was a bug

Good Luck!


Wow, so we have to read posts on a forum to start a plane? Feel sorry for all the people who don't come here
  #3  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:31 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorrorRoach View Post
Wow, so we have to read posts on a forum to start a plane? Feel sorry for all the people who don't come here
Yes when it comes to the mixture setting being fixed, which resulted in it being reversed one only had to read the initial post by Luiter that contained the links to the patch along with the instructions on how to install it.. But that is to be expected.. As for starting the engines.. No reading of a post was needed, in that the first guy to get em started didn't have a post to read.. All that was needed there was a little trial and error and some patience (9 mins worth).. The latter being a rare commodity these days in the xgen sound byte gimmie gimmie now era.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 09-29-2012 at 02:37 AM.
  #4  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:42 AM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Yes when it comes to the mixture setting being fixed, which resulted in it being reversed one only had to read the initial post by Luiter that contained the links to the patch along with the instructions on how to install it.. But that is to be expected.. As for starting the engines.. No reading of a post was needed, in that the first guy to get em started didn't have a post to read.. All that was needed there was a little trial and error and some patience (9 mins worth).. The latter being a rare commodity these days in the xgen sound byte gimmie gimmie now era.
You don't seem to understand. 9 minutes is the time it takes to get the engine started after repeatedly pressing the starter to get the engine to a point where it'll actually start. It's not 9 minutes until "OH! That's how you do it. Voila".

If you want to sit at a desk and press the "I" key over and over for 9 minutes, go ahead. No amount of moving mixture this way or that way, moving fuel to just 11.482895 percent, etc is going to cut down on that time if this bug is in any way like the last one of this nature.

At least this one is ONLY 9 minutes. That one was more like 15. I'm prettttty sure that Battle of Britain pilots didn't run out to their Hurricanes and quickly strap themselves in to have a NAP for a quarter of an hour.

So unless you can record a video that shows:
a) the game starting with the current patch update in the lower right corner
b) jumping into an online server such as ATAG or Storm of War Campaign Server via the menus
c) selecting a Hurricane DH 5-20 or Rotol
and
d) managing to start it within 30 seconds

Unless you can prove all that, I'll take what I've seen with my eyes and done with my hands and heard from my trusted friends over your remarks.

But I won't hold my breath for it. You see, I'm patient like that.

I'm not being accusatory or angry in this, btw. I'm honestly asking for a video tutorial if it's as simple as you're making it out. If Catseye can't get the thing started within 9 minutes, then I'm preeettttty sure that I can't. He's a better pilot than I am by a long chalk. Nitrous probably got it because he simply is a stubborn bugger and held on through the rage
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book

Last edited by bw_wolverine; 09-29-2012 at 03:50 AM.
  #5  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:44 AM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

oh what does it matter ill buy next sequel even if still i cant start the game just for the laughs i get here

i love it here makes me look normal
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
  #6  
Old 09-29-2012, 04:22 AM
Jugdriver's Avatar
Jugdriver Jugdriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
i love it here makes me look normal
lol.....................

I am going to quote you on that one raaaid

JD
AKA_MAttE
__________________
ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.4ghz
ZALMAN 120mm CPU Cooler
Intel X25-M 160GB SSD
Mushkin Enhanced Redline 8GB
MSI R7970 OC
ATI Catalyst 12.3
KINGWIN Mach 1 1000W
COOLER MASTER HAF 932

MajorBoris
"Question: Do you forum more than you fly?"

raaaid
"i love it here makes me look normal"

Last edited by Jugdriver; 09-29-2012 at 04:25 AM.
  #7  
Old 09-29-2012, 10:21 AM
yobnaf yobnaf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 60
Default

Great patch. Love the realistic start up procedures for the planes now. Good work, dev team.
  #8  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:39 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default

Wolverine wrote:

"At least this one is ONLY 9 minutes. That one was more like 15. I'm prettttty sure that Battle of Britain pilots didn't run out to their Hurricanes and quickly strap themselves in to have a NAP for a quarter of an hour."

+1

The machines were always started and warmed up by the erks before dawn, so they would be ready to scramble at a moment's notice. Sitting on an airfield in the cockpit waiting for a cold Spitfire or Hurricane to warm up is not authentic. The aircraft, upon starting, should already have been warmed up and ready to roll immediately just as the real Spits and Hurries were.
__________________
  #9  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:50 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

I wonder if it would be possible for someone to write a script, on spawn engine temperature so and so. Just wondering out loud here
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
  #10  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:56 PM
senseispcc senseispcc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 598
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
I wonder if it would be possible for someone to write a script, on spawn engine temperature so and so. Just wondering out loud here
.
good could some do it waiting for a correction of the game !?!
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.