![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think it's also worthwhile adding that in this thread: "http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=34369" the first post by BlackSix reads: "Attention! Please ask questions for Luthier in this thread. He will try to answer them tonight." This followed Luthier saying here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...63&postcount=1 "I'll be back at the end of the day to answer your questions". Falstaff "I meant to post this earlier....it is silly to scape-goat Luthier or make him the poster-boy". I'm just pointing out he was the one who came forward and offered to answer the questions, so he is the point of contact. Let's also remember BlackSix saying that the answers weren't coming last-week as it was a Saturday and they don't work Saturday's! So regarding my original post. I work most of the week, but I do visit the forums regularly. I make time to post (like now). It's a few minutes...that's all. If they had spent a few minutes each week over the last-year telling us that the issues raised, the bugs reported, the suggestions given were actually of use and interest to them AND ACTED ON THEM, the software would be in a far better state than it is now, it would represent the input and knowledge of a simming community that really does know what it's on about and it would have held more authority if they had actively responded to the BETA TESTERS input as this is what we were told we were???? Remember everyone saying "IT'S A BETA", well after all the bugs that the players found and posted, the issues they raised, the questions they asked....we find out that the bugtracker isn't even read by the Developer's? What's the point of releasing Beta Patches and we then get told we are Beta testing....only to not actually bother listening to the reports on the testing itself? It's this type of 'support' that just makes me think that we are currently being strung along until the 'NEW' BoM comes out. I look forward to hearing the words "Place-holders" and "not final graphics/FM/DM/Weather/Features" being used until at least a year after it's release.....and then there'll be a sequel that will fix that too! So I ask again. To rebuild some trust and faith in those who actually do care about this software (CloD not BoM for now), please answer some the questions you asked for and get one of your software developers to actually look at the Bug tracker and see what the main issues really are. How the hell can you expect to fix the software when you aren't even looking at the issues and listening to your beta (patch) testers? MP
__________________
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|