![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
thanks
![]() from your link: The K.B.B. Rate of Climb Indicator Mark IB* is a simple means of measuring the rate of change of atmospheric pressure due to change in altitude of the aircraft in which the instrument is fitted as i predicted this scienpriests went for the obvious path do you know what turbulences are? sub and overpresures, they happen all the time so the climbing indicator goes crazy the elemental way to fix this flaw is to link airspeed and angle of climb to have a precise climbing rate reading ![]() edit: its an edicated guess wflying really low the altitude gauge can even read negative :O
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL Last edited by raaaid; 09-21-2012 at 01:46 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely,
except perhaps if IAS <>TAS and the air itself does move up and down very fast (let's say we could call this phenomenon.... wind?) ![]()
__________________
Details: Asus P5BE Plus / Q9650, 3.0 GHz ---- Win 7 - 64 / 4 GB RAM ---- ATI 4890, 1 GB VRAM |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
oh but the vertical wind maybe a maxium of 20 kph while the horizoantal whcih measures the plane +-400 so the error is much less than with the flawed transformed barometer
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could use your radar altimeter? Might be more accurate but would be dependant on the terrain beneath you, or a GPS, or inertal navigation system, or one of those laser gyroscope dodads. It would just be a data gathering and programming issue.
Hmmmm! What did they teach in the BAK syllabus? "High to low lookout below?" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
well but at least you agree with me that altitude needles in the game should oscilate and the climbing rate one a lot
![]()
__________________
3gb ram ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2 I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was there not German method where the needles didnt jump around? - electrical gauges or something? In clod V1 the red sides needle used to jump around but the reds whined till it was fixed. Even though as you say it was realistic........... So it was there but they took it out because a vocal part of the red side didnt want that realistic factor.
![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
because to get a "highly acurate" verical angle of climb/descent you need an INS or a pretty good attitude indicator and they did not have neither of these back then on the other hand your "inquietudes científicas" generate pretty interesting posts ![]()
__________________
Intel i7-2600K // Asus Maximus IV Extreme Rev3 // 2xGTX580-3GB (SLI'ed when able) // 16 GB DDR3 // SSD // HDD WD 10K // Win7 x64 // LG monitor 24´´ 1920x1200 res |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a pilot I can say I haven't really noticed any wobbly oscillations of a VSI ... ever. Atmospheric pressure variances do not occur with the great horizontal or vertical rapidity that would be required to make it do so. Remember, it's just a bourdon tube with a calibrated leak.
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just totally ignore me...
I guess you guys were not there......................................... mazex - what about that radar / command fighter thing your too busy to work on? any news? Last edited by 5./JG27.Farber; 09-21-2012 at 10:08 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|