What is "aircraft stability" - IN VIDEO

[macro]

i see what you mean ace, but its not relative anyway.

wondered how long it would be before he bumped this thread.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by macro

i see what you mean ace,

S!

Originally Posted by macro

but its not relative anyway.

Maybe.. maybe not.. All I know for sure is no one has provided any proof to say for sure one way or another.. The few test done by a few people of a few things is just too few to say eitherway!

Originally Posted by macro

wondered how long it would be before he bumped this thread.

Oh that is easy.. When ever he makes an error in a thread, he simply bummps a bunch of 'other/old' threads, like this one, to take the focus off the error he made in another current thread.. In short muddy the water to take the focus off the error.. SOP for him.

[Crumpp]

When ever he makes an error in a thread,

OMG, what error? Please point it out so it can be addressed.

Otherwise, it has nothing to do with this conversation.

My reply is based on the fact you don't have a clue about thrust producer aerodynamics and are not someone who can be shown anything different.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

OMG, what error?

case in point ^^

[Osprey]

His error was to totally miss the point of what you were saying, probably in yet another herculean effort to show us how clever he is and how thick we all are.

[Al Schlageter]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

OMG, what error? Please point it out so it can be addressed.

There was only 16 squadrons of Spitfires that used 12lb boost and 100 octane fuel during the BoB.

[Crumpp]

His error was to totally miss the point of what you were saying, probably in yet another herculean effort to show us how clever he is and how thick we all are.

Because I think we should model the aircraft accurately in all aspects and this is not what Tagert wants, I missed his point?

No, I disagree with it. Disagreement is not the same thing as not understanding nor has any mistake been made.

If you are going to simulate an airplane, then do it accurately. What is wrong with my statement?

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by Crumpp

If you are going to simulate an airplane, then do it accurately. What is wrong with my statement?

Nothing is wrong with that statement, the problem lies with your interpretation of accurate, which in essence translates to what Crumpp wants.

[Crumpp]

Baloney.

I am not making any outlandish claims and everything I have ever said is backed up by the science, documents, and the facts.

Prove your accusation, bongodriver.

You are just pissed because I called you out a couple of times on some really basic information.