Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2012, 03:04 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
WWII 'prop' flight sim act like a KOREAN 'jet' sim..
Not at all, power producers and thrust producers have completely different aerodynamics as well separate methodology for determining most performance parameters.

The whole premise is completely ludicris regarding a computer game.

Who cares how fast or slow a virtual gameshape is going as long as the it acts in relation to the other objects in the game in a reasonable facsimile of what it is trying to simulate.

In otherwords, it must behave somewhat like the real thing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2012, 03:40 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Not at all
That is your opinion and your welcome to it..

But the point your missing is this..

The only thing we know for sure is that no one has provided proof to say one way or another..

All we have thus far are a few tests of a few things done by a few people that hint at some errors in accuracy of flight modeling..

But nothing that anyone would or could say is conclusive let alone complete..

In summary, the user testing thus far and the fact that 1C admits there are issues should be enough to cause all to take pause before making any statements of FACT on how accurate the flight model is simulating performance let alone relative performance!

Hope that helps! S!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2012, 05:43 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
That is your opinion and your welcome to it..


It is not my opinion that power producers and thrust producers use completely different formulation to determine performance and have completely different aerodynamic properties.

It is just a fact.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-14-2012, 05:49 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
It is not my opinion
No, it is your opinion

And again, your welcome to it!

I and others just don't agree with it

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
that power producers and thrust producers use completely different formulation to determine performance and have completely different aerodynamic properties.

It is just a fact.
Ah, now I see where you are confused..

Note I said nothing about the 'powers'..

That was your tangent topic to take the focus off what I was talking about..

That being the 'speed'

Referring back to my post, note that I was talking about the relative speed, and how scaling it up or down can change the way the game is played

Which is why the attitude that accuracy does not mater as long as everything is relative is in error

Hope that helps
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2012, 05:46 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default



Wow.....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2012, 05:53 PM
macro macro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 217
Default

i see what you mean ace, but its not relative anyway.

wondered how long it would be before he bumped this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2012, 10:16 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macro View Post
i see what you mean ace,
S!

Quote:
Originally Posted by macro View Post
but its not relative anyway.
Maybe.. maybe not.. All I know for sure is no one has provided any proof to say for sure one way or another.. The few test done by a few people of a few things is just too few to say eitherway!

Quote:
Originally Posted by macro View Post
wondered how long it would be before he bumped this thread.
Oh that is easy.. When ever he makes an error in a thread, he simply bummps a bunch of 'other/old' threads, like this one, to take the focus off the error he made in another current thread.. In short muddy the water to take the focus off the error.. SOP for him.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 09-17-2012 at 10:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.