Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover
Reload this Page Weather/Terrain effects. Surely this is the minimum we expect for CloD or the Sequel
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-09-2012, 06:25 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default
Similar video (this one with a P-51). Just look at the terrain and environment. Thick clouds, great lighting on them, buildings with no 'popcorn' textures...

War Thunder:

http://youtu.be/mAkyZ1IFX74
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-09-2012, 08:12 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default
Mysticpuma have you seen this game, awesome graphics!



Now its not all about the graphics is it...
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-09-2012, 08:29 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
Mysticpuma have you seen this game, awesome graphics!



Now its not all about the graphics is it...
So true.

WT is superior to that arcade game in graphics and every other way. WT is not as good as a finished CoD will be, but it is miles better than that kids toy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2012, 08:43 PM
PotNoodles PotNoodles is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 357
Default
The problem with COD is it's taken far to long to get of the ground. We are 18+ months on and there is still talk about getting the game running stable before they can move onto other fixes .

Make the game stable after all this time I hear people cry.. Your having a laugh aren't you? WELL AREN'T YOU? All I can say is if it's taken this amount of time to get it running stable, then how longs it going to be before they fix the massive list of bugs they still have? I'll be an old man before this is finished at this rate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2012, 08:51 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by PotNoodles View Post
The problem with COD is it's taken far to long to get of the ground. We are 18+ months on and there is still talk about getting the game running stable before they can move onto other fixes .

Make the game stable after all this time I hear people cry.. Your having a laugh aren't you? WELL AREN'T YOU? All I can say is if it's taken this amount of time to get it running stable, then how longs it going to be before they fix the massive list of bugs they still have? I'll be an old man before this is finished at this rate.
And yet you're still here...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2012, 11:32 PM
PotNoodles PotNoodles is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 357
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
And yet you're still here...
I don't live in this forum like you David, I visit to see if there's a patch available. I know you live in this forum because you seem to have an answer to everyone that posts a negative comment, I always see you in there arguing the toss. Have you ever thought about becoming a politician?
Last edited by PotNoodles; 09-09-2012 at 11:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-10-2012, 12:41 AM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by PotNoodles View Post
I don't live in this forum like you David, I visit to see if there's a patch available. I know you live in this forum because you seem to have an answer to everyone that posts a negative comment, I always see you in there arguing the toss. Have you ever thought about becoming a politician?
Yes, you do appear to live in this forum. And you whine constantly, but you are still here. If you want to show the devs that there are consequences for the long time it is taking them to fix the game, leave. That'll teach 'em...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-09-2012, 09:16 PM
icarus icarus is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 323
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by PotNoodles View Post
The problem with COD is it's taken far to long to get of the ground. We are 18+ months on and there is still talk about getting the game running stable before they can move onto other fixes .

Make the game stable after all this time I hear people cry.. Your having a laugh aren't you? WELL AREN'T YOU? All I can say is if it's taken this amount of time to get it running stable, then how longs it going to be before they fix the massive list of bugs they still have? I'll be an old man before this is finished at this rate.
Yes, I agree 18 months is a long period of time for what they have achieved since release. At least they have made some progress. But it is discouraging that it is taking sooooo long. I think it is still possible to fix this thing, but it is getting harder to keep that faith with such incremental steps and such long periods of time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-09-2012, 09:23 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Yes, I agree 18 months is a long period of time for what they have achieved since release. At least they have made some progress. But it is discouraging that it is taking sooooo long. I think it is still possible to fix this thing, but it is getting harder to keep that faith with such incremental steps and such long periods of time.
+1 its quite clear that only a skeleton crew are now maintaining COD, we know what the rest are up to
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-09-2012, 10:22 PM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default
Skyrim?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.