![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it possible to have the P-40L?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From what I understand, if the P-40F were to be modelled then the P-40L could be as well with no visual changes (that I can tell) required. Just a slight change in FM with the reduction of some weight.
Apparently it made very little difference to overall performance. Some charts on these types would probably be useful.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It almost sounds like it could be modeled as a load-out option rather than a different plane with its own FM, DM and slot.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
With the L and the N one armament option would be to remove two .50cals and ammo for even more light weight performance. This was commonly done although many were reverted back to 6 .50cal standard in the field.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Certainly, some of the early P-40/Hawk 81 series were armed with just British armament and ordinance. This might have been true for later ones as well. Also, I believe that it was typical for Soviet P-40s to be equipped with Soviet ordinance although they kept the U.S. guns. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rockets too?
14th Air Force used the bazooka type rockets in China. (Same as on our current P-47).
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great news! Thanks much!
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|