Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2012, 08:00 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default CoD Spitfire Mk.IIa vs. RWD Spitfire Mk.I +6lbs and +12lbs

Just did a quick top speed per altitude (TSPA) test of the CoD Spitfire Mk.IIa

Not sure what the performance of the Mk.IIa 'should be'

But I did a comparison of the CoD Spitfire Mk.IIa to the real world data (RWD) of an Spitfire Mk.I running at both +6lbs and +12lbs

The CoD values match the +6lbs better than the +12lbs

Again, not sure if that is correct..

And there is also a chance that I made a mistake during the CoD test.. What with all the mixture this and that reversed level this and that there is a good chance that I did. And keep in mind that I have not converted the CoD data to std atm yet! That is in the works!

Anyway, not trying to say one way or another how good the CoD FM is for this plane, more just showing how easy you can compare the in-game CoD test data to real world data using my website

Enjoy

PS the attached pictures are from my website.. All you have to do is right-mouse-click on the picture and select save picture to save it to your PC
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CoDSpitfireMkIIa_vs_RWDSpitfireMkI06lbs.jpg (112.0 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg CoDSpitfireMkIIa_vs_RWDSpitfireMkI12lbs.jpg (111.5 KB, 18 views)
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 08-23-2012 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:28 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

There is not much point in comparing the CLOD Mark II to the RWD Mark I imho..

By the way, how do you work out TAS? Is it an IAS conversion from instrument readings or some automated/recorded reading from the sim itself (like iirc was the case in Il2-46)?
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2012, 10:00 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
There is not much point in comparing the CLOD Mark II to the RWD Mark I imho..
As I noted, this test was not done to show how good or bad the CoD MkII FM is as much as to show how easy it is to compare CoD test data to Real World Test data. I am working on uploading more and more real world data as we speak.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.