Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2012, 04:47 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Someone just posted a screenshot of a Bf-109e they are working on, and rumors of other WWII content in the works it could be great fun, but I love the P-51 from DCS even though its not one of my favorite planes from WWII.
Awesome, I was hoping since they now have access to a 190 that they would be working on that , will have to wait.

Please could you post a link.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2012, 05:37 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

The other beta is OK, some good points, some not so good. It will be interesting to see how both play out when relatively finished. In the end I will spend most of my time flying the better one, which is still quite unclear. Right now my money would be on the new IL-2 series providing a better simulation if finished, but the question is, how long will the new IL-2 series beancounters patience last. My guess at the moment, would be, that people who enjoy quick furbal type missions will gravitate to the other sim while those that prefer more complex missions and organized online wars will gravitate to the new IL-2 series. For the moment I wil enjoy what the other has to offer now, while waiting to see how the more detailed and complex IL-2 series development plays out.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8
Asus PT6 Motherboard
6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600
Asus GTX580 Direct CU II
60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it
500gig HD Dual Boot
Samsung 32"LG 120hz
MSFF2 Joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder pedals
Voice Activation Controls
Track IR 5 ProClip
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2012, 05:44 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
The other beta is OK, some good points, some not so good. It will be interesting to see how both play out when relatively finished. In the end I will spend most of my time flying the better one, which is still quite unclear. Right now my money would be on the new IL-2 series providing a better simulation if finished, but the question is, how long will the new IL-2 series beancounters patience last. My guess at the moment, would be, that people who enjoy quick furbal type missions will gravitate to the other sim while those that prefer more complex missions and organized online wars will gravitate to the new IL-2 series. For the moment I wil enjoy what the other has to offer now, while waiting to see how the more detailed and complex IL-2 series development plays out.
By quick furball type missions you mean the general area around Hawkinge on the ATAG server?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2012, 06:31 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
By quick furball type missions you mean the general area around Hawkinge on the ATAG server?
Thats the beauty of the COD map and future maps. You can choose to fly quick furbal missions over Hawkinge, Calais, or even deep penetration missions as far as London, and always have a home field to land at. The other map may still only include Manston, Hawkinge, and Canterbury, which is adequate for furbals, but totally useless for most complex missions.
__________________
Intel core I7 950 @ 3.8
Asus PT6 Motherboard
6 gigs OCZ DDR3 1600
Asus GTX580 Direct CU II
60gigSSD with only Windows7 64bit, Hotas Peripherals, and COD running on it
500gig HD Dual Boot
Samsung 32"LG 120hz
MSFF2 Joystick
Cougar Throttle
Saitek Pro Rudder pedals
Voice Activation Controls
Track IR 5 ProClip
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2012, 06:41 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Theres nothing that compares to a big map when bombers are available
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.