![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Of course Glider, but I wanted you to focus on the bolded part.
That "reported to us" is what gives me doubt about the numbers of total accidents. It should be really interesting to read those reports: we ignore the investigation's method of the AABI and of course if, as you say, the known accidents were investigated again.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 08-02-2012 at 08:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I hope at least that we have dealt with the comments about the Spit wings that bent and needed repair. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
1) Was the AAIB the only one actually called to investigate on accidents? 2) How many accidents were not reported? 3) We don't know the AAIB method of investigation: did they need the wreckage?... or they could investigate by interviews with the witnesses of the accident? 4) As you says, I repeat, I can be that some accidents not reported as result of a past investigation. A plane is losing its wings during recovery from a dive? The first accident of this kind required an investigation, probably also the second one... but how many until it's clear that the plane can be pull so much and it become ? We can't have unanswered questions... until then I can't trust they are not the only accidents during the world war. The one you posted is not a fact, but it's a very good starting point for the real one.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 08-03-2012 at 12:42 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|