![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
dont worry soon china will take over and there they execute corrupt goverment members |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Free men are those of us who are free from the armed. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just so you can be placed at ease and the discussion can stay civil just make sure that you accept it is what it is today and the free ownership of firearms to its citizens will always be apart of the fabric of the United States. It will not change. It cannot. Its a right that isn't conveyed by a government but before it. A charter of negative liberties that state what they cannot not do. And the right shall not be infringed. So its like a tattoo it isn't going away.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm sorry Bewolf, but you're sending postcards of wisdom from Utopia.
Your thinking should be valid for armies as well then, right? They're meant to do what they do (defending/attacking) by means of killing other people. Are you ready to give up on the right do defend your freedom in name of a "no guns" policy? As for the kids that find the keys to the locker etc... they're very rare cases, mainly because wise gun owners teach the responsibility and the risks related to firearms to their kids from a very young age. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No idea how your army argument comes in here or how to understand it, though. Btw, the right to defend your freedom. In all these debates it is all about right this, right that, like in a store where you pack in what you like best. But with every right there are responsebilities. You can't claim the one and dismiss the other. And responsebility is something most people shun these days. That starts with "**** the environment as long as I can drive my SUV, i have the RIGHT to be an ass, f*ck the government and the UN!" and ends with the dead guy next door. Now that is certainly overexxegerated. But if only one person out of ten is irresponsible and it moves to having guns, then this one is already one too many. I am sorry about the 9 others (to whom I also belong, btw, I am actually quite fond of weapons). But having weapons for purely fun reasons, as the defense argument is a self fullfilling prophecy given the huge amounts of weapons availabe on the black market due to the easy to get legal market, is that very same irresponsebility I am talking about.
__________________
Cheers |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is why you have a criminal justice system, with courts and the concept of due process. Using your guns when the FBI comes calling is just going to get you killed. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/...me-2444936.php "criminal justice system" and "process" aren't probably the best deterrents for such a scenario, isn't it? I'm sure that something like "burglary", "rape" and probably "murder" would have been the actual scenario, had she not had guns to defend herself and her baby.. Last edited by Sternjaeger II; 07-30-2012 at 05:19 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Its better to have a gun and not need it, then to need it and not have it." Don't think this is true? Well just look at Switzerland. And on a slightly different note: On a national level more people in the US then ever are legally buying guns and violent crime is reduced. And yet Chicago, the city with the strictest handgun laws in the US, now has one of the highest murder rates, and high crime too. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...up-crime-down/ |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|