Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2012, 06:22 AM
Force10 Force10 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 371
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
But you dont know if they sped up or slowed down the track which will also affect the average... either way, it just feels like you are looking at things to nit pick...wait till the patch and if its no better then you can bitch till you are blue in the face...
I'm not looking for things to bitch at....if they show us screenies with less average fps and lesser quality textures...I guess that makes you happy? I guess we will see when the patch comes out. Probably would have been wise to leave the framerate counter off in this case if they knew people would see the lower numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2012, 06:45 AM
kristorf's Avatar
kristorf kristorf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 897
Default

Afraid to say I am greatly underwhelmed, again

Lesser quality equals a nearly playable frame rate, pathetic really especially as lots of people spent hard earned money upgrading to what where (only a short time ago) top end PC's
as the old 'recommended' specs proved massively under stated and they/we still can't get a decent FPS unless we spend hundreds more £/$'s on yet more hardware.

And still no word on making the Channel Map (the centre peice of this game) usable in coop mode, another huge let down.
__________________
Regards

Chris



http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php





Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU,
GTX580 3gb OC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2012, 06:49 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
~ Probably would have been wise to leave the framerate counter off in this case if they knew people would see the lower numbers.
only for the whinge then to be "they're not showing the frame rate... what are they trying to hide?"

absolutely pathetic
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4

Stand alone Collector's Edition
DCS Series



Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2012, 07:24 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

You can please all of the people some of the time.
You can please some of the people all of the time.
There are some people on the banana forum you can never please. At all. Ever.

BlackSix has told us they have made some improvements. He tried to demonstrate that with a few screenshots we now know were made under very specific circumstances which are unlikely to apply to most of the 100+ different PC specs out there never mind the widly differing game setings. Perhaps he should just have stuck to the words to avoid all the speculative crossfire.

So why not wait until you have the patch on your PC and have tested it before getting out of your prams to complain about it. Don't worry, I'll be the first to complain if I don't like it. When I've seen it.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2012, 10:58 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
You can please all of the people some of the time.
You can please some of the people all of the time.
There are some people on the banana forum you can never please. At all. Ever.

BlackSix has told us they have made some improvements. He tried to demonstrate that with a few screenshots we now know were made under very specific circumstances which are unlikely to apply to most of the 100+ different PC specs out there never mind the widly differing game setings. Perhaps he should just have stuck to the words to avoid all the speculative crossfire.

So why not wait until you have the patch on your PC and have tested it before getting out of your prams to complain about it. Don't worry, I'll be the first to complain if I don't like it. When I've seen it.
+1 Its time they really got the ban hammer out, these guys are not going to stop and its ruining the community!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2012, 11:29 AM
Attila's Avatar
Attila Attila is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria
Posts: 110
Default

The only fault on this update is, that they have forgot to give us the systemspecs. of the test PC! Maybe that stopped the discusion before it starts!
I think it's a 2 core PC or worse with an older graphicscard! In this case the fps isn't such bad!
But let us wait and see....!
__________________
i7 920 @ 2.67 MHz
12.0 GB RAM Kingston KHX1600
WIN 7 64 bit
SSD OCZ Vertex 3 120Gb
ASUS HD 6950 DirectCU II
Catalyst 12.6
Saitek Evo Force+Rudder pedals
TrackIR 5
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2012, 11:39 AM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
+1 Its time they really got the ban hammer out, these guys are not going to stop and its ruining the community!
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2012, 02:03 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redroach View Post
You're not actually deducing the new, not-yet-out patch's performance (and whine about it...of course) based on the dev's screenshots. Do you?

This forum should be set up with a corner that provides mandantory psychological treatment...

In all fairness, the "other" side is doing the same thing by saying "woohoooo, thaaaaanks, wow, 50% higher fps" etc, for a patch they have not yet seen. They still dont even know when they get to see the patch and thats not because the lack of promises mind you (read overdue). The "track record" if you will, should speak against any and all superlatives until claims are thoroughly proven, but, and this astonishes even me, it doesn't. It astonishes me despite the fact that i count myself into the "others" (well, maby not so much lately due to the track record thingy i mentioned earlier) and even i, any more, don't get all giddy for essentially nothing. Dont get me wrong, maby they v done something ground breaking but those screens say absolutely nothing either way. So, imo, its all talk until proven otherwise, just like it should be for everybodyelse if you really think about it in a calm relaxed manner.

Different side of the same coin and im for one is sick of the coin itself and what brought it here in the first place. And no, im not talking about the forum and its members.

Last edited by Baron; 07-28-2012 at 02:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-28-2012, 02:11 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
In all fairness, the "other" side is doing the same thing by saying "woohoooo, thaaaaanks, wow, 50% higher fps" etc, for a patch they have not yet seen. The "track record" if you will, should speak against any and all superlatives until claims are thoroughly proven, but, and this astonishes even me, it doesn't.

Different side of the same (exact) coin and im for one is sick of the coin itself and what brought it here in the first place. And no, im not talking about the forum and its members.
Hit the nail on the head.
__________________
Luthier: If not for your guys' criticism and incredibly high standards, we'd never have become what we are. Keep it up!

Source for the sceptical: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...11&postcount=9
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-28-2012, 02:19 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider View Post
Common sense here, would be for the developers to say nothing and present a patch/ upgrade when ready

At least no-one can genuinely say they (devs) aren't being honest

and cop the "what are they (devs) hiding by not showing it?" crud that some would come out with? ?

crikey, there would be no trouble getting a dummy spitting team together here

Spot On

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
you can please all of the people some of the time.
You can please some of the people all of the time.
There are some people on the banana forum you can never please. At all. Ever.

Blacksix has told us they have made some improvements. He tried to demonstrate that with a few screenshots we now know were made under very specific circumstances which are unlikely to apply to most of the 100+ different pc specs out there never mind the widly differing game setings. Perhaps he should just have stuck to the words to avoid all the speculative crossfire.

So why not wait until you have the patch on your pc and have tested it before getting out of your prams to complain about it. Don't worry, i'll be the first to complain if i don't like it. When i've seen it.
Agreed 100%

The only thing worse than whining is pre-whining

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
+1 Its time they really got the ban hammer out, these guys are not going to stop and its ruining the community!
Bingo
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.