Stability and Control characteristics of the Early Mark Spitfires

[taildraggernut]

Start another thread.

Sorry but that doesn't really cut it, there is nothing 'off topic' in my asking for your sources for claims you make on this thread, it's an open forum and that all sounds a bit evasive if you ask me, not to mention the rude tone you keep coming back with once someone asks a question.

I PM'd you the answer because it has NO BEARING on the Early Mark Spitfires.

The link to the modern day adopted standards has no bearing on the Spitfire either but it seems no problem to include it here....the adopted standard here seems a double one.

The purpose of this thread is to define the early Mark Spitfire characteristics so they can be included in the game. Those characteristics are measured, defined, and agreed upon by all parties involved in the Spitfires design.

That may be what you'd like it to be, in a one man show unhindered way, but it seems you have attracted a difference of oppinion, for the most part the enquiries into your sources have been valid and polite and deserve to be answered, it just seems the threat needs to titled 'according to Crumpp'

It is not to debate the history of stabilty and control engineering.

You did after all claim that the british had no adopted standards and have put NACA on a pedestal as an example of an establishment which had adopted standards.....this does not conform to what you put in the PM, I just think it's a little unfair to expect to have a thread dedicated to your 'sole' oppinions.