![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When the same amount of money and time has been poured into the project, it could very well do run that well. Honest question, where you around for the launch of that one? I was and i didn't buy it because of the online requirement, but kept following it in case they dropped it. They didn't and i moved on with other things, but i have a very clear memory of how things went during the first year or so after its release because i was following the news. So, do you know how long it took to get RoF to the standard you are familiar with now? 18 months. That's for a sim with a constant revenue stream due to the business model chosen and much lower demands on behalf of the engine: -planes not rendering further than 2km from you (no, not even dots, they were simply invisible outside that range to conserve resources) -an empty frontline where artillery shells explode on non-existent targets after being fired from non-existent guns (in other words, scripted events to spice things up) -an inability to handle more than 200 or so objects in a single mission...trying to run a mission on a ROF server similar to the CoD ones used on ATAG was simply no go, the whole thing crashed -all aircraft mounted guns having the same ballistic characteristics, it made no difference if you were firing spandaus or Lewis guns, the bullets, muzzle velocities, effect on DM were all the same. and so on. I remember all the complaints about the long distance ground textures turning low detail, the bad multi-core optimization, anti-aliasing not working, crashed to desktop, slow progress of updates and patches, etc etc etc. Does it sound familiar? Quote:
Also, to everyone else, keep the thread on topic. This thread is to discuss what you like about CoD and give some examples (stories/after action reports, screenshots, etc). If you want to talk about the things you don't like, open a new thread. It's not like someone is preventing you from creating new topics. If you keep derailing this one, posts will be moved/deleted. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes this game is sweet. TY for the shots
Sometimes it helps to remember just how awesome it is that hurricane looks it was undergoing engine repair in the HMS Elizabeth (you know the the mega airship aircraft carrier with triple runways and two cross over runways using American Helium. ) and it got bumped out of the hanger bay and fell out the back during uber turbulence. yeah for those complaining about the ROF, man don't you know ROF is the new 1946. It is the spiritual and literal successor to Il-2 1946, so its right to make comparisons. Because if ya ain't doing it right, ya ain't doin it wrong, so this is why they keep singing the ROF song. Doesn't matter if apples or oranges grow on different trees, they don't taste the same, and the method of accessing the edible part is unique to each fruit, because the orange is the new apple or the apple the new orange, you can compare them. Because both games have props, both use piston engine airplanes, they've got machine guns, so its the same. Shoot man, in the simhq forums they're (ROF fans) are even saying the ROF engine is better for the A-10 then DCS' |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyway, back on topic.
Here's a few more raw and untouched screenshots. This time, we see a Blenheim attacking a Me 109 Out of the sun...!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I remember with il2 1946 when making co-ops, that the AI Blenheim would become a fighter after dropping it's bombs. Best Regards, MB_Avro. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm think i may of hit a nerve.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nah, the main thing is that every second post in this thread is you pointing out the same things in ROF. Sure, it runs better, so does Il2 Forgotten Battles, it's an older and more simple engine so that's a given. Yes, it's in a more polished state, once again it's had years to get there (and it had a similarly rough start). Most of us are ROF players as well, although the game has started to get a little behind the times for me (unfortunately). It's not a contest, and threads like these are great for sharing pictures and highlighting little details made possible by such an advanced engine, your multitude of posts don't contribute much to this discussion.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you are unnerving. This is the Il2 CoD Forum, not the RoF Foum.
__________________
Cheers |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm, not seen a screenshot for the last four pages, interesting innit...........(more like the usual crock..)
__________________
Regards Chris ![]() http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU, GTX580 3gb OC |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A20 B25 Pe2 Stukas HS129 Vals etc etc Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 07-16-2012 at 04:23 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|