![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=26532 And from that list we have recived support in the form of 14 patches, i.e. [PCH] (2012.05.05) v1.06.17582 BETA PATCH - May 05, 2012 [PCH] (2011.10.17) v1.05.15950 Release is now live! What to expect next [PCH] (2011.10.06) v1.04.15866 core fix [PCH] (2011.10.05) v1.04.15866 Beta [PCH] (2011.09.06) v1.03.15527 Beta [PCH] (2011.06.24) v1.02.14821 Release [PCH] (2011.06.21) v1.01.14762 Beta [PCH] (2011.05.18.) v1.01.14550 Retail [PCH] (2011.05.04) v1.01.14413 Beta [PCH] (2011.04.27) v1.00.14305 Beta [PCH] (2011.04.15) v1.00.14072 Beta [PCH] (2011.04.08.) v1.00.13954 Release [PCH] (2011.04.07) v1.00.13915 Beta Agreed Which is why I allways make sure I can back up my claims (see above) Now.. Let me guess.. You and yours are going to claim that 14 patches over a years time is NOT considered SUPPORT
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
should they be releasing patches daily? and a beta patch does not make a game beta, even worst case the game is still an RC but not a beta.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Btw - If it has a beta patch applied to it it's a beta in my eyes. An official patch is what makes it no longer a beta. At present it's back in beta stage because it's found to have faults still. Last edited by PotNoodles; 07-10-2012 at 08:40 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Stop being disingenuous. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Originally I posted on page 1......that is still the question
Currently I see a lot of in-fighting but this makes me wonder whether the lack of information really has made the community turn on itself? Even a monthly update like the one I linked to a RoF would surely give users a chance to understand what to expect and what to look forward to? Currently it seems that in-fighting occurs because no-one is sure just what is happening or going to happen, other than speculation? If the speculation was changed to actual facts by the 1C team...maybe the clarity of position and direction would help those on either side of the fence to at-least sit on it together? MP
__________________
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
14 patches that haven't really fixed much. It's the "tree falls in the forest" deal. If 14 patches are released, but they don't really fix the glaring problems, is that considered excellent support?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not misrepresenting anything, you are desparately trying to tell us the devs have done 'nothing' in the way of trying to fix this yet here we are reminding you that on 14 separate occasions a different patch be it a beta or release that had to be coded each time.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Excellent.. Maybe? One thing for sure is that 14+ patches in a year does NOT qualify as NO SUPPORT which is what you and yours would have us belive Quote:
You and yours DONT consider 14+ patches in the last year as support.. Who would have ever guessed that?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|